User talk:VS6507/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This recently blocked user's talk page has been blanked of all non-essential discussions.| Hello, Aleksa Lukic, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia!

You may begin by reading these:

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested articles or the list of wanted pages.

You can edit any pages you want! Anything you write can be changed immediately. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on Talk pages, please sign your name by typing "~~~~" (four tildes)

Good luck and happy editing! The Rambling Man (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Noble gases

Please stop copying and pasting from en.wiki. This is a breach of copyright under GFDL and you are creating a complex article in Simple English Wikipedia. The Rambling Man (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please stop removing content from pages. If your vandalism continues, you will be blocked from changing Wikipedia. EhJJTALK 21:14, 29 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of changing privileges. If you believe this block is unfair you may request to be unblocked by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. You may want to consider reading our guide to unblock requests before requesting to be unblocked.Goblin 12:18, 11 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

VS6507/Archive_1 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

I am so sorry for my Wikipedia mistakes or vandalism, I am beginner on Simple English Wikipedia and that's why I have done my mistakes. I have written two articles (Dzhe and Vuk Karadžić), I can continue with writing articles if you unblock me.

Decline reason:

Aleksa, in your email to me it seemed that you were active at another Wikipedia. You should therefore know how to behave towards other users and not personally attack them, which was the primary reason for your block. You have also been incivil to other editors, and vandalised several user pages. I also see quite a few deleted edits of copy-pastes from the "regular" English Wikipedia. Whilst you have created two articles, I feel that, at this time, I am unable to approve this unblock request. Any other admin may overide me however and I would not consider it wheel-warring. Regards, Goblin 20:53, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just a very basic question: Other people (who are also new to SEWP) editit here without adding nonsense/vandalising. So what can you tell us that might make us change our mind? - If you are unblocked, you might simply continue as you did before? --Eptalon (talk) 20:51, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Ok, i've AGF'd here and unblocked you. Do be aware however that if there are any more questionable offences, I will not hesitate to outright block you indefinitely, without a warning, and I will decline any unblock requests (though that does not stop other admins from doing so. I hope that you understand. Goblin 11:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Request handled by: Goblin 11:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I accept your appology for what you wrote a week ago on my talk page (diff). I am not an administrator and cannot unblock you. If you are unblocked, you must be careful to follow our rule about no personal attacks, as well as others. Regards, EhJJTALK 23:19, 17 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, VS6507. You have new messages at Bluegoblin7's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Goblin 18:00, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Main Page 2

I have deleted Main Page 2 for you. :) TheAE talk 20:47, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Well, if you want a make a new Main Page, you can do that at User:Aleksa Lukic/Main Page. Just as long as it isn't in the mainspace, you can create one. Hope this helps. :) TheAE talk 21:38, 21 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:ST#Politika

I have commented there. Cheers, Dylan620 Review me 13:19, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Sremska Mitrovica

Hello, I added Sremska Mitrovica, which seems to be in the north of Serbia. Are there any other Mitrovicas we need to keep track of? --Eptalon (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Laugh-In

Uh, what's with the delete tag you put on this page? (Which another person thankfully caught and removed.) You have stated no reason why this article should be deleted. You are also making edits without giving explanations for them. Zephyrad (talk) 14:47, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

A lack of external links is not an excuse (much less a reason) to propose deletion of an article... and not explaining one's edits is even less acceptable, on any Wikipedia. (And did you not notice the links, to related articles on other Wikipedias?) You would do far better to find external links like you think the article needs, and then add them, if you feel so strongly about it. Proposing deletion in toto for the reason you have given is basically throwing the baby out with the bathwater. Zephyrad (talk) 23:54, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Look buddy

What is up with you? You aren't even writing in proper english, or simple english. You're just rolling around making trouble. Of course I don't wish you death-from-above, but if you don't get off my case, and then a clown comes round your house and stabs you to death and hides your dismembered body under the floorboards, I'm not going to be power-weeping, I tell you now. Sorry if that's a bit over the top but that's just the way it is. Platter 'o ham (talk) 16:24, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Template:Serbia

 Done – I have renamed it to Template:Serbia-stub. Have a nice day, TheAE talk 17:05, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Your image

Hi. I have deleted your image. Our policy is that images cannot be uploaded directly to the Simple English Wikipedia, and any images uploaded here will be deleted. Please upload any images to the Wikimedia Commons. Images uploaded there can be used in Simple English Wikipedia articles in the usual way. Thank you. Barras (talk) 18:19, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edits

Your edit to G has been reverted. Please do not undo helpful edits as it may be considered vandalism. Thank You. Griffinofwales (talk) 18:20, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

user pages

Please do not make or change other editors' user pages unless you have their permissions. You just created one, and edited another without their consent to do so. Either way (talk) 20:40, 13 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Fr33kman's rfa

Hi. I've reverted your vote. The rfa has been closed for a couple of months now. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 22:01, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

OMG, I'm really sorry about that. That will not repeat again, because I couldn't see that notification, I suggest to write that= with bold letters, not italic how is now. --AleksA ツ 22:16, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. These things happen! Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 22:20, 15 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page protection

In a recent edit, you added {{sprotected2}} to Madagascar. Please be careful not to add this template to pages that are not actually protected. I have fixed your error. If you'd like to request protection, please ask an administrator at WP:AN. Thanks! EhJJTALK 00:33, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion

When you tag an article for quick deletion, please add {{QD}} and a reason listed at WP:QD at the top of the page. Please do not delete the content of the article (unless it is an attack page) because then it is hard for us to know whether your tag is correct. Thanks! EhJJTALK 06:17, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Page moves in the Wikipedia namespace

Hello there,

you did some page moves in the Wikipedia namespace (like Wikipedia:Blocks and bans to Wikipedia:Blocking policy). Please note that the titles of these pages were the result of a community discussion; renaming them without such a discussion is probably a bad idea. If you want to move them, please start a discussion on Simple Talk first. Based on the result/consensus of that discussion they can then be moved.

Thank you for your understanding. --Eptalon (talk) 16:50, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

QD

I saw you added QD G3 here. It was completly wrong be careful, and you did well reverting yourself. Consider this a warning. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 21:48, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have understood my error and automatically revert it.--AleksA ツ 21:52, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I know you did.Well done, but just be more careful. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 21:55, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa

Can you PLEASE move this page back on en wiki? It's Madagascar: Escape 2 Africa, NOT Madagascar 2: Escape to Africa. PLEASE and THANK YOU! 70.146.241.192 (talk) 21:58, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done By American Eagle. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 22:03, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
(e/c) Note: I have moved the page, see here and here – that is the correct title. Thanks Yotty. =) American Eagle (talk) 22:06, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

Check out my contribs. 68.220.162.231 (talk) 22:38, 22 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. Can you nominate it or should I, under an account? 68.220.162.231 (talk) 00:09, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

.ac

I have quick deleted .ac which you just added. The article was just a copy and paste of the English Wikipedia's infobox plus one sentence. Please do not do this again as it is A. a copyright violation and B. does not create a simple article. Either way (talk) 11:16, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of .ac

The page you wrote, .ac, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was copied from another Wikipedia. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Pmlinediter  Talk 11:29, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Enwiki refs

When you created this the references were blatantly red and broken. Did you not notice this? Please be more careful. Additionally the language is not very simple at all. I'm going to tag it as complex. Majorly talk 16:03, 23 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]


VS6507 is currently:
Online


Thanks!

Thank you for participating in my RfA, which passed with 21 Support and 1 Oppose. I hope I will be able to fulfill your trust as an admin on Simple. Special thanks to RyanCross for nominating me! --Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz!

Quick deletion of Khat

The page you wrote, Khat, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was copied from another Wikipedia. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Pmlinediter  Talk 10:10, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Quick deletion of Khat

The page you wrote, Khat, has been selected for quick deletion. This is because the page was breaking copyright law. If you think this page should be kept, please add {{wait}} below the line {{QD}} and say why on the talk page. If the page is already gone, but you think this was an error, you can ask for it to be undeleted. Pmlinediter  Talk 10:44, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Copy right and copy and paste from en wiki

Hi! This is warning, because it is not the first controversial article. Please read WP:CR. If you create another copy right violation I will block you temporarily from changing simple, that you have enough time to read our gidelines and polices. Regards, Barras (talk) 10:54, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

User:American Eagle/Wikiproject Good articles

Please remove yourself from this list. Your recent voting at WP:PGA would suggest you don't yet know how to review articles properly, and therefore you should hold off until you are much more experienced. Thank you. PeterSymonds (talk) 11:03, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your last chance

here you undid an IP. The IP removed vandalism and you put it back. The next controversial edit means a 72 h block. Barras (talk) 11:42, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Reminder

Hi, if you are mass-creating many articles, please request the bot flag from a bureaucrat so you don't flood recent changes. Thanks. Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz! 16:51, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

How I can do that?--AleksA ツ 16:55, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask on a bureaucrat's talk page. I believe Eptalon is currently online. Meetare Shappy Cunkelfratz! 17:01, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bot flag

Hello, Aleksa Lucic. I am sorry to tell you, but you seem to be new here - this morning we had a copyright problem with one of the articles you created. For this reason, I'd prefer you spam the recent changes, so to say. I am sorry, once the community trusts you getting the bot flag (which does nothing else but hide the edits in the recent changes/new changes log) will be much easier. --Eptalon (talk) 17:17, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Categories

Please read the note at Category:Top-level domains regarding your recent creation of top level domain stubs, and categorise them correctly, or at least, consistently. The Rambling Man (talk) 17:28, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

...and add at least one interwiki. Thanks. Barras (talk) 17:29, 24 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked again

I have blocked you for 31 hours for this edit. This is a copyright violation since you copied it from the article you used as a source. You have been warned a lot in the last day or two to pay close attention to your edits and not make copyright violations in articles. Because you have done it again, you have been blocked. Either way (talk) 13:15, 25 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Indef block

You have been blocked indefinitely from changing Wikipedia in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of changing privileges. If you believe this block is unfair you may request to be unblocked by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. You may want to consider reading our guide to unblock requests before requesting to be unblocked.

fr33kman talk 14:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

VS6507/Archive_1 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Please check those articles: Dzhe; Vuk Karadžić; Pioneer; .rs; Lje; Digraph (orthography); Nje; Politika;Bože Pravde; Mitrovica; Troll; Mačvanska Mitrovica; Troll (movie); Troll 2; Boris Tadić; .gu; Country code top-level domain; Troll 3; Bouvet Island; Åland Islands; Democratic Party (Serbia)); Federal Republic of Yugoslavia; Vladislav F. Ribnikar; Agranulocytosis; Icosagon; Generic top-level domain; Travian; Browser game; President of Serbia;Animated cartoon; Madagascar (disambiguation); Sakhalin; Dragon (Yu-Gi-Oh!); Type of monster in Yu-Gi-Oh!; Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia; Grand Theft Auto IV; Dje; Serbian Cyrillic alphabet; .ac; .ad; .ae; .af; .ag; .ai; .al; .am; .an; .ao; .aq; .ar; .as; .at; Country code; .au; .aw; Real analysis; .ax; .az; Tranquillisers. But, no chance, I am to bad.

Decline reason:

See the reason in the block log. You created after warnings copyright violations. No reason to unblock you. -- Barras (talk) 20:48, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention some extremely vile comments to an editor here; and no, I don't care that you apologized for them. You're banned, period! fr33kman talk 20:50, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

For example: ???--AleksA ツ 20:52, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
+ I would like to request from any administrator to delete all of my contributions (all pages that I created, you can see it above), because there are not threat as useful here. Thank you, --AleksA ツ 20:54, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
* * Oh, yes of course it is: Author wants deletion. --AleksA ツ 20:58, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
But others edit these pages too, so you aren't the only author. please stop now. Otherwise, I change the block settings to cannot edit own talk page. Thanks Barras (talk) 21:00, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Barras, is correct. Once you release under GFDL you have no legal right to ask for their removal. I have changed your block settings so that you can not edit your talk page now. I'd advise you not to harras people by email either or that too will be disabled. fr33kman talk 21:04, 26 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page unblocked

I've unblocked your talk page so that you can discuss your block here. Note: you are on a one-strike rule. Any attack will lead to your account being permanently blocked with all privileges disabled. As for your block on all other pages, I believe it is justified and see no reason to unblock you from editing the Simple English Wikipedia. You have broken many of our rules and your edits have been of very low quality. There is a Wikipedia in your own language. I suggest you create an account there. EhJJTALK 16:54, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

VS6507/Archive_1 (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

After I have carefully studied my changes, and take a Wiki break I am giving to Wikipedia team my final unblock report: I have been blocked in April 15th for personal attack to EhJJ who is, by the way great user, and then I was promissed that I will never repeat same bad things again. I have proved my promisse and I spend a lot of effort to be decent to other uses and I was never copied the entire of en. article to Simple (replace content). I have spent lot of time to help our project and created mass of articles and reverted some vandalism (minor of vandalism actually not was vandalism, how I can't see at that time quickly). Then I was some copyrights vailations (I know that is serious things, but I have wish to help). For my last change in mainspace (http://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Jack_Russell_Terrier&diff=prev&oldid=1556485), I have earned a block (on 25th May). I was very confused in first moment, because coping some parts of text with some grammar and Wiki repair is allowed on sr. project (I have found the link which can be very helpful for me, and which no adminstrator has given to me: http://simple.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Copyrights). I know it is hard to belive me getting in view my first block... But there's only one honest true: If administration unblock me, I'll try to make a little bit less changes in mainspace (except rv real vandalism), I will try to repair for that time my low-quaitly articles, learning the language in the same time). When my en. level grow enough high I will start to creating more articles). Otherwise, (if I make any, was a minor mistake), following my behavior, administrators can very easy re-block me. +Changes under my IP address (79.101.68.26 can prove that I can give useful contributions to Wikipedia.

Decline reason:

you tried to come back with a sock puppet and started by voting on an RfA. The sockpuppet is confirmed: Wikipedia:RfCU#Aleksa_Lukic_and_Masha_Ashner. No reason for an unblock. -- Barras (talk) 16:45, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

And what of your sockpuppetry? Pmlineditor 16:42, 3 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:VS6507/Archive_1&oldid=4999403"