User talk:Bonkers The Clown

Hello, Bonkers The Clown, and welcome to the Simple English Wikipedia! Thank you for your changes.

You may want to begin by reading these pages :

For some ideas of pages to work on, read Wikipedia:Requested pages or the list of wanted pages.

You can change any pages you want! Any changes you make can be seen right away. You can ask questions at Wikipedia:Simple talk. At the end of your messages on talk pages, please sign your name by typing "~~~~" (four tildes)

If you need help just click here and type {{helpme}} and your question and someone will reply to you shortly.

Good luck and happy changing! Osiris (talk) 02:31, 26 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Bonkers The Clown. An article you created Niggers in the White House, has been automatically tagged for deletion because it looks like vandalism. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. If you think there has been an error please feel free to remove the tag and leave a message here explaining what happened. Thank you. --GoblinBot4 (talk) 09:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Nonsense Bonkers The Clown (talk) 09:39, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

RfD nomination of Niggers in the White House

An editor has requested deletion of Niggers in the White House, an article you created. We appreciate your changes, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also "What Wikipedia is not").

Please comment on the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2013/Niggers in the White House and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also change the article during the discussion to address the nominator's concerns. But you should not remove the requests for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate. Thank you very much. --Chenzw Talk 11:08, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

MJ

You're a fan, I take it. Shiningroad (talk) 07:39, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

More than just an ordinary fan, although in real life I (try to) contain my excitement. Pity he died before I could even have a chance meet him. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 07:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Simple Wiki is just too bare and desolated... Bonkers The Clown (talk) 07:45, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ha. I've never met an actual fan of MJ irl. Although of course plenty of people say they like his music now he's dead. And I agree. Shiningroad (talk) 07:47, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Some are hypocrites, but not me. Been loving his music ever since I discovered it. I dare say I've heard 95% of all his released songs, and many of his unreleased ones, *cough* through special means. I'm on a rampage today :) Bonkers The Clown (talk) 07:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When did you discover it? I've not heard some of the songs you've made articles for tbh. Shiningroad (talk) 07:49, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

When I was a young child, scanning through the gossip section of the papers to read about Jackson's apparent rhinoplasties. That immediately got me interested in the man. I haven't heard all of the songs he recorded as a youth, but the rest, I've heard pretty much all of them. Welcome to the digital age. :) Bonkers The Clown (talk) 07:52, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

What's with the poem article you made? Something about you being banned from en-wiki? And indeed, at the height of my MJ love I didn't have the internet.Shiningroad (talk) 07:54, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You mean "Niggers in the White House"? Long story... And not one I'm happy to tell. Nevertheless the ANI archives are always there for you to peruse. I also admit that my love for him has diminished considerably ever since 2010, but every few weeks or so my interest gets rekindled, especially when I see saucy news items on his parents or his estate or his doctor, etc. He is simply amazing. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 07:59, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what ANI is...And did something happen in 2010? My interest fluctuates too. Shiningroad (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ANI: Administrator's Noticeboard (Incidents). Although it can also mean plenty other things... 2010 was the year his first posthumous studio album Michael was released. Didn't like it, though. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 08:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

So far I've got to, the article got put on the front page of Wikipedia. Had to Google 'bonkers the clown niggers white house' to find that tho. Shiningroad (talk) 08:30, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it did. That had a few repercussions, though. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 08:48, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Are you planning on adding any actual content to any of these pages? You're flooding NewPages with stub articles of no real value; most of them only contain "X is a song by Michael Jackson". This is completely useless for the wiki. All of those pages are going to get deleted or redirected unless you add something substantial to them to verify their independent notability. Osiris (talk) 08:02, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Context is present... So it cannot be speedied for a lack of context. These are singles and singles are inherently notable. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 08:06, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I think you wouldn't be causing annoyance if you were adding more content to the articles such as categories before moving on to make your next article. I'm trying but I can't keep up. :P Shiningroad (talk) 08:09, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Btw 'tragic death' doesn't sound neutral. Shiningroad (talk) 08:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, I let my emotions get in the way. Sorry about that, remove it on my behalf, would you? Bonkers The Clown (talk) 08:15, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

By "context" you mean the name "Michael Jackson"... And no, actually, they're not inherently notable. We've deleted many articles on singles here before. Did you read the link I provided? And they're still very likely to be redirected to album article or a discography page until something worth reading is added. Osiris (talk) 08:11, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hah, how different Simple is from En. Well, my work is done. If you wish to redirect them to a nonexistent article (on the album), be my guest. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 08:13, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

One begins to see why you were banned elsewhere. --Auntof6 (talk) 12:41, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

How philosophical. One begins to see the light of enlightenment. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 13:42, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Hey Bonkers, it was bad to see you blocked on en.wiki. But well, I'm glad you survived it. So after the block, things going smooth for you on wiki? (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 17:11, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And what trouble you get yourself into again? Just went into your contribs on en and saw the red bar of doom. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 17:21, 21 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Indeffed on DYK noms over race issues? I think a ban on anything related to race issues is enough. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 09:30, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, PSLE 263 (4A*), top school, distinction for HCL. School entered: ACS(I) | But will appeal to MOE to enter RI. (✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 09:31, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations! :D Hahaha, you beat me in terms of number of A*'s, but I beat yer based on just the score. ;) HCL for you? 263 is an excellent score, but the top score for my school was 271 excluding HCL points. I don't think you can revoke your acceptance of the DSA offer... You can try but Chances are minutely slim. Why change your mind now? :P You should have changed it before accepting. Now it is a bit too late. ACS does not deserve to benefit from great young scholars like you. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 13:08, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

QD requests

Just letting you know that I've put QD requests on most of your MJ singles stubs. I left the one that was nominated for record of the year. That seems notable. Gotanda (talk) 07:57, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

FYI, I am declining the QD requests on a technicality. The QD criterion for notability applies only to people, groups, companies or websites. Gotanda, if you think these need to be deleted, you will have to take them to WP:RFD. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:53, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Precisely, some people really need to change their spectacles. Or probably their eyes. But well I cannot fault the person that went on a QD-tagging rage without checking the criterion beforehand. He may be just born this way. * zen-like smile * Bonkers The Clown (talk) 09:38, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

You have been blocked from changing pages on Wikipedia for 1 day in line with Wikipedia's blocking policy for disruptive editing and indiscriminate usage of tasteless sarcasm. Please stop. You are welcome to make useful changes after the block ends. If you believe this block is unfair you may ask to be unblocked by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. If you cannot do this or the reason is private please send an e-mail to simple-admins-l@lists.wikimedia.org and an administrator will look at your reason and reply. You may want to read our guide to unblock requests before asking to be unblocked.

You should really reconsider the way you interact with other editors.

Note to administrators: please review WP:ONESTRIKE and en:Special:Contributions/Bonkers The Clown if/when dealing with an unblock request. Chenzw Talk 10:29, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, kind admin Chenzw. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 13:09, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

And I've upped this to indefinite. Shortly after your block expired, you're back harrassing the same user. You're clearly only here to cause trouble. Take it somewhere else, thanks. Osiris (talk) 09:52, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You've got mail!

Hello, Bonkers The Clown. You have a new email! Please check it at your convenience.
Message added 09:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC). You can take off this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{YGM}} template.

(✉→Arctic Kangaroo←✎) 09:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock request

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators said no to this unblock request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not unblock the user without a good reason. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Bonkers_The_Clown (contribs · deleted contribs · block log · filter log · global contribs)

Request reason:

Osiris is unfit to be an administrator as he lacks the ability to properly take into account the proper context of an incident. It was never my MO to "harass" our dear admin Chenzw. In fact I did not even know him until he graciously blocked me. What nonsense this is, when I was merely exemplifying my point by showing that Chenzw himself had divulged personal info online. How is that "harassment"? Did I threaten to burn his house or slaughter his mother? Absolutely not. Everything I did was justified. I seek to be unblocked and I ask that Osiris be stripped of his admin rights. He is misusing them and it is clear that he is biased against me and towards his fellow admin friend Chenzw. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 10:32, 24 November 2013 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Editors have a right to keep their personal information private, and revealing that is harrassment. Osiris was quite justified in using his admin rights to block on the grounds of violating the one-strike rule. You broke the rules, not Osiris. Unblock denied -- Peterdownunder (talk) 10:47, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Peterdownunder, you are another funny one. Chenzw had already publicly disclosed the information I had revealed!!! Of course he has the right to keep his personal info private, but he did not! Besides, I just wanted to prove that Arctic was not disclosing previously unrevealed private info, as his block rationale stated. Bonkers The Clown (talk) 11:00, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yet it was quite clear that Chenzw wished for that information not to be repeated here, or he would not have gone to the effort of having it removed and oversighted. Despite that, you linked to where the information could be found and referenced a specific website where you believed his real-life identity was published (apparently specific enough that at least one other editor, Arctic, was able to find it with ease).

I blocked you for several reasons. Less than a week after being indefinitely blocked from the English Wikipedia, you began editing here and continued similar behaviour. You immediately began editing in the area from which you were topic-banned on the English Wikipedia, and then managed to attack two editors within the space of less than a week. A short block apparently wasn't enough of a warning to keep things appropriate: less than 24 hours after the block expired (and ten days after being indef'd from another wiki), you harrass the administrator who blocked you. Considering all of this, I concluded that you were not learning from past experiences and that a block was justified to prevent any further damage to the project. Osiris (talk) 11:08, 24 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]