Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard

This is a message board for talking about tasks on Wikipedia that only administrators can do. Please put new messages at the bottom of the talk page or click here to start a new discussion.

Please note that the messages on this page are archived periodically. A message may therefore have been archived. Note however, that the archives must not be modified, so if something needs discussing, please start a new discussion on this page.

Are you in the right place?

• This is the Simple English Wikipedia. Click here for the Administrators' Noticeboard on the regular English Wikipedia.
• Use Vandalism in progress to report serious and urgent vandalism from other users to administrators.
• Use Requests for permissions to request administrators to give you tools that can help you do things faster on Wikipedia, such as rollback.
• Use Simple talk to ask general questions about Wikipedia and how to use it.
• See meta:Steward requests/Username changes to change your user name or take another user name.
• See WP:RFCU for CheckUser requests.
• See WP:OS for oversight.

Battle of Iki (1274)

@Ferien You have recently deleted my Battle of Iki (1274) article and I would like to request a userify for it with all the article revisions so I can work on it further more Shadow. 547 (talk) 23:32, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@Shadow. 547:  Done. Please make sure you are actively working on it, if it remains in userspace untouched for some time, it may be deleted. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 23:33, 18 February 2026 (UTC)

@Ferien: Since Shadow has been blocked in the meantime, we might need to clean up his userspace. It's not only the battle of Iki article, but quite some more, see Special:PrefixIndex/User:Shadow._547/. We have old userpage of an indefinitely blocked user as reason for deleting pages, but I think we haven't really used that in ages... -Barras talk 16:42, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The unblock request is still open so I would wait to clean up userspace until that matter is settled and then some time passes after that in case of subsequent appeal. CountryANDWestern (talk) 16:50, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Sorry, I just realised my reply below can seem as though it's overriding you - I don't mean it to be that way. In my mind this was quite a clear delete case, there was not really any opposition to userfying so I allowed it, but now the user is blocked I think it is just best to delete it. There's no rush of course, but also we do get a lot of these go stale in userspace. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 10:47, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Barras, please feel free to delete it, either as old userpage (which we might want to look at policyifying at some point), G4, G6. Whichever you see most appropriate. You could argue any of them apply. --Ferien (talk | join TBA!) 08:05, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

No worries, I didn't see any problems with userfying the article, otherwise I'd have complained already. ;-) I now deleted all the subpages. I think we've already enough such stuff sitting around in the userpace and should do some clean up there anyway. In the case of Shadow being unblocked, it's easy to restore whatever is needed. -Barras talk 21:27, 25 February 2026 (UTC)

Firman of Mir Muhammad

A user, Dasani053, is making disruptive edits by repeatedly copy-pasting content throughout the article. They are also adding a military conflict infobox, despite the main event being a genocidal campaign that lasted two years.--Sinjarist (talk) 10:06, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Ali beg Was Captured and Executed And And Mîr Muhammad Conquest of Daseni Emirate So We Can Add this to We should say Soran Victory Dasani053 (talk) 16:06, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

hello there, can you two work it out, and ideally add sources to support your claims? Eptalon (talk) 16:13, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

I have blocked both users for 48 hours as both continued to edit war after warnings and discussion. CountryANDWestern (talk) 20:11, 19 February 2026 (UTC)

Hello the issue is he keeps changing the infobox to the conquest which is only one incident of the genocidal campaign, its like changing the infobox on Bosnian genocide to Siege of Srebrenica. and he keeps copy and pasting texts from other articles making it hard to read. sometimes with no page number like this which he kept adding back and he made the campaign section very messy. he also uses Ai to make other pages such as Yazidi–Mizuri raids and the Sheikhan massacre. I would like to revert all his changes to before the edit war. Sinjarist (talk) 10:45, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

The page is on the list of deletion You dont have to philosophize here Dasani053 (talk) 14:33, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

Yes at first I got some help from Ai but then I edited it myself and changed the Sources Dasani053 (talk) 14:45, 23 February 2026 (UTC)

New filter?

It would be useful if a filter was created to prevent new users (not autoconfirmed) from removing qd or rfd tags from articles. PieWriter (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2026 (UTC)

Doe someone want to take a look? PieWriter (talk) 03:34, 8 March 2026 (UTC)

Protection request

Within the past few days, there have been disruption in the page Eastern Europe, so I am requesting that page gets protected. NX3710 (talk) 19:27, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

 Done -Barras talk 22:32, 1 March 2026 (UTC)

Attention

Filer has been blocked for block evasion. CountryANDWestern (talk) 13:58, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. No further changes should be made to this discussion.

---

The account Yeatglazer has been banned on English Wikipedia for trolling and sockpuppeting. I have come across the article Ali Khamenei, had a deeper look, and found signs of similar behavior 1 (accusing Wikipedia of valuing Islamic terrorists), 2 (similar allegation), 3 (denying QAnon is a disproven conspiracy theory). The account seems to be pushing POV instead of editing neutrally. Also pay attention to this. ~2026-13522-85 (talk) 05:02, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

You are banned, you are not supposed to be here. You are the one conflating criticism of Israel with antisemitism. The IHRA definition of antisemitism is a persuasive definition and can be seen as an example of weaponization of antisemitism User:Polygnotus/Steven1991 Yeatglazer (talk) 02:21, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

I have no idea who that person is. I only saw your edits because you edited Ali Khamenei. I am talking about your own behavior on English Wikipedia and here. You are the one found to be running several socks across Wikipedia. Your obsession with Jewish topics is abnormal, like you did here by claiming The Forward is "unreliable" for being "Jewish socialist", which is exactly a Nazi trope conflating Jews with socialism/communism. It is obvious what you are doing here. No one is weaponizing anything when you make your position so obvious. ~2026-13610-66 (talk) 08:32, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

Why are you also obsessed with trans people? Why are you conflating trans people with shooters? I don't see how this qualifies you as a neutral editor? ~2026-13610-66 (talk) 08:40, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

We need to beware that Yeatglazer also made apparently anti-transgender edits, like this one. These offensive redirects are equally concerning. It is unclear if this breaches WP:NOTHERE, when their sole purpose of participation is to promote bias against Jews and transgender people across the site. I would @Significa liberdade @Yamla @Moneytrees, the English Wikipedia admins who handled his block, in case they wish to comment. ~2026-13942-75 (talk) 14:51, 3 March 2026 (UTC)

More anti-trans rambling by Yeatglazer, on ENWP. It pretty much explains their edits on this Wikipedia. ~2026-13931-23 (talk) 09:37, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

• Can an admin look at this for a WP:BOOMERANG block on the temp account as an obvious sock of Steven1991 based on behavior? Look at the history on Antisemitism in the Soviet Union - created by Steven1991. Polygnotus pruned the article with useful edit-summaries and since then temp accounts have reverted Polygnotus's changes including most recently 2026-13931-23. The argumentative style of the temp account is very similar to Steven1991's style (and in part that style is what led to Steven1991's block on en wiki and here). It was disruptive then, it's disruptive now. Ravensfire (talk) 17:01, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

  English Wikipedia admins have checked: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yeatglazer#c-Newslinger-20260304170400-Yeatglazer-20260303233700 .

  Behavioral evidence does not support linking between the temp accounts and Steven1991. ~2026-13956-50 (talk) 19:59, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

  He was just here earlier litigating with user:Polygnotus for cleaning up his edits Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Current issues and requests archive 92#c-Polygnotus-20251126151100-Steven1991 Atp, most antisemitism related articles that he frequents should be semi-protected. And again wp:duck, there is no need for technical evidence. Whats the point of a block if he is constantly evading it Yeatglazer (talk) 05:38, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

  Said the person who believes the QAnon and thinks that Jewish sources are unreliable because they are "socialist" ? Poly may have a point about them but you don't have, when you are banned from English Wiki for far-right trolling yourself. You don't get to pretend as being on the right side when you have a history of far-right POV push yourself. ~2026-14136-31 (talk) 08:15, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

  Can you tell us how many sockpuppets you are owning as well? Haven't English Wiki admins found that you are socking? ~2026-14136-31 (talk) 08:16, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

  Perhaps explain this? ~2026-14136-31 (talk) 08:24, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Yeah that is Steven. But y'all already know that. I can post my watchlist so they can all be semi'd if that would help? Polygnotus (talk) 06:02, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

You don't have evidence. Gut feeling is not evidence. Yeatglazer made problematic edits including ones which justify conspiracy theories like QAnon, any lurkers are right to point it out, esp. when Yeatglazer is under a ban on ENWP themself. Someone bad does not automatically validate the activity of Yeatglazer as said by ENWP admin Newslinger: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Yeatglazer#c-Newslinger-20260304170400-Yeatglazer-20260303233700 ~2026-14136-31 (talk) 08:26, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Requests_for_checkuser#Yeatglazer and meta:Steward_requests/Global#Global_block_for_sockpuppets_of_Steven1991. Polygnotus (talk) 12:40, 5 March 2026 (UTC)

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Deleting user pages of indeffed users

I received email from Shadow. 547, who was indeffed on 21 February. The user was asking for a restore of one of their user subpages that had been deleted. Research showed that Barras deleted a number of this user's user pages on 25 February with the reason "Old userpage (subpage) of an indefinitely blocked user". I didn't check all the deleted pages, but the one the user wanted restored had been created only about a month ago, so I restored it. I'm aware that there might be issues with an indeffed user using any user pages here, but if the only basis we have for deleting them is being old then this one didn't qualify.

It seems to me that a page should be at least a year old, maybe older, before it is considered old enough to delete under this provision. We don't delete old user pages of users who have been inactive for much longer, so deleting those of indeffed users seems strictly punative. Is that our policy? -- Auntof6 (talk) 16:24, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Hi there. It pretty much depends on how you define old. My point was mainly to delete the per RFD deleted page that has been restored to Shadow's userspace. See #Battle_of_Iki_(1274) above. While doing so, I just decided to completely clean-up and deleted the whole set of subpages. The problem is, that we don't come back to such pages and they will be there for ever, which I think is no useful but just bypassing reality. Furthermore, I already provided Shadow the last revision of the page via discord, they just refused to believe me that I really provided everything. After complaining more and more, they got banned from discord by an mod there. That being said, Wikipedia is not a web host and thus the page should be deleted again. Barras talk 17:07, 2 March 2026 (UTC)

Abusing my mother

Hello admins, i reverted two edits by IP (2026-14050-18) on Gujarat Kshatriya Sabha because he removed some sourced information from that article without any reason. But this IP reverted my edit and abusing about my mother "teri maa randii" which means "Your mother is a whore and moll". Bassloverpunj (talk) 20:29, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

I have warned him, feel free to warn him again while waiting for admins, multiple warnings give admins a better reason to ban him. ExplorerofSpace (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

• if he continues

ExplorerofSpace (talk) 20:34, 4 March 2026 (UTC)

Ok, i got it, thanks for quick action. Bassloverpunj (talk) 07:18, 5 March 2026 (UTC)