User:Fixing26/RfDs/Nominated

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Ongoing

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Ferien (talk) 18:01, 4 September 2021 (UTC)

Miraj Bibi

Miraj Bibi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Notability. Looking online, I can find little coverage in reliable sources. I can find no evidence of the awards granting notability for the person. Fixing26 (talk) 15:36, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete. Mostly promotional material. Two sources listed only have passing mentions of this person. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 20:56, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:36, 3 September 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Ferien (talk) 18:46, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

Carter Wilkerson

Carter Wilkerson (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable. I think WP:BLP1E applies here. En.wiki redirects it to a list of most retweeted tweets. Fixing26 (talk) 16:42, 22 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete. Notable for a tweet? Get serious, this is nowhere near notability. A one-tweet wonder. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:21, 1 September 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:42, 29 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 04:57, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Sandeep Kumar Mishra

Sandeep Kumar Mishra (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think this poet/author/etc is a notable. The page seems to have been deleted before from en.wiki and I can't find much coverage of the person online (note that I had to search with their name + poet or author as the name appears to be quite common). Fixing26 (talk) 22:17, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Dear, You said that you can't find much coverage of the person online. Please check the references.The person is a poet and writer. So mostly you will find about him on magazines sites,anthologies and online websites. There are so many online coverage about him. He has received international awards. If the name appears to be quite common, obviously, then we have to specify it by writing poet or artist or writer on google. I have attached some links about his online presence for you If you need more I can send more-

https://www.iafindia.com/mr-sandeep-kumar-mishra/ https://www.apwriters.org/author/sandeepmishra551974/ https://www.saatchiart.com/account/artworks/827162 https://outsidein.org.uk/galleries/sandeep-kumar-mishra/ https://www.indianpoetryreview.com/books https://www.amazon.in/Heart-Breaks-Sandeep-Kumar-Mishra-ebook/dp/B08GY1G9KR https://www.aieregistry.org/users-post-gallery/member/sandeepkumarmishra/ https://stillpointartgallery.myportfolio.com/dance http://www.internationalbookawards.com/2021awardannouncement.html https://www.theheartlandreview.com/page3 https://nwg-inc.com/word/?page_id=5212 https://classicalpoets.org/2017/04/21/a-timeline-of-english-poetry-part-i-the-song-of-amergin-caedmons-hymn-bedes-death-song-deors-lament/ https://mudseasonreview.com/2016/12/poetry-issue-26/ https://coldnoon.com/author/sandeep-kumar-mishra/ https://www.nereview.com/tag/sandeep-kumar-mishra/ http://phenomenalliterature.com/author_detail.php?a_id=432 https://www.literaryjournal.in/index.php/clri/article/download/354/475?inline=1 https://thinairmagazine.org/2019/02/15/five-poems-by/ https://www.poetryonthemove.net/well-known-corners-1/Corona--Vorona-Days-Ways https://helixmagazine.org/2018/10/25/a-rainbow-memory-sandeep-kumar-mishra/ https://inlandiajournal.com/2020/08/10/sandeep-kumar-mishra/ https://www.greatbritishpolitics.co.uk/americas/1015-trump-s-idyllic-usa-a-white-america-or-a-vibrant-america https://extranewsfeed.com/is-indonesia-a-model-muslim-majority-democracy-56054c58085c https://goodmenproject.com/politics-2/qatar-v-saudi-arabia-side-will-west-take-wcz/ https://www.visartscenter.org/event/the-shelter-group-brightview-public-art-project/ https://www.duendeliterary.org/sandeep-kumar-mishra https://reallysystem.org/issues/fifteen/pebbles/ http://www.activemuse.org/2020_Collections/2020_Varsha_Poems/Sandeep_Kumar_Mishra.html https://diggingpress.com/2018/12/28/community-no-30/ https://digitalcommons.csbsju.edu/studio_one/vol43/iss1/16/ https://www.ibtimes.co.in/sandeep-kumar-mishra-classicist-modern-poetry-829072 https://www.rigorous-mag.com/v1i4/sandeep-kumar-mishra.html https://starcentralmagazine.com/entrepreneurship/2020/10/03/sandeep-kumar-mishra/ https://www.cinetalkers.com/writing-about-womenthe-phenomenal-sandeep-kumar-mishra/ https://asiansignature.com/contemporary-poets/sandeep-kumar-mishra/ https://feversofthemind.com/2021/08/11/4-poems-by-sandeep-kumar-mishra-my-father-body-orchard-youth-body-orchard-older-days-pebbles/ https://www.setumag.com/2017/12/Sandeep-Kumar-Mishra-Poem.html https://internetvoid.com/2019/01/17/sandeepkumarmishra/ https://multiplicitymagazine.com/2020/09/poems-sandeep-kumar-mishra/ https://www.saatchiart.com/sandeepmishra https://www.redfez.net/@SandeepKumarMishra https://www.atelier-of-healing-anthology.com/foo-wee-san-sandeep-kumar-mishra https://thewritelaunch.com/2018/01/pebbles-books-father/ https://literarytitan.com/2020/11/03/literary-titan-book-awards-november-2020/ https://storymirror.com/profile/4m4sa3am/sandeep-kumar-mishra https://www.sandeepkumarmishra.com/events https://www.elephantjournal.com/now/pregnancy-and-sex-understanding-the-mystery-how-to-bump-the-bump/ https://indiestoday.com/award-winners/ https://oprelle.com/pages/rise-up-anthology-poetry-contest-winners

  • No wikied all the links so they are not linked back to google.

Please have a second thought about it. I request you. --Hiya2011 (talk) 23:14, 19 August 2021 (UTC)

I've replied to the same content on my talk page. Fixing26 (talk) 01:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Dear No Award is small. People don't get a single award all their life. If some website doesn't fall in your criteria,it doesn't mean that all websites are such. Poems or article publishing takes lot of competition from hundreds of writers. Don't make it a prestige point, if we change decisions in our life for something good that doesn't mean we were wrong.--Hiya2011 (talk) 08:29, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

  • Delete: I remember an article similar to this and I believe the outcome was delete. Also, based on the the above from the article creator, the language and terms used are very reminiscent of what we have seen for successful RfDs. 19:26, 20 August 2021 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by PotsdamLamb (talk • contribs)
  •  Delete. The sources I managed to trace were not independent professional reviews, but looked like placed ads or notices. I'm bound to think notability has not been proved. Macdonald-ross (talk) 13:42, 21 August 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:17, 26 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 04:54, 27 August 2021 (UTC)

Ameer vayalar (Taekwondo)

Ameer vayalar (Taekwondo) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request
Ameer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete)

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Claims to be notable, but doesn't appear to be. Seems quite promotional too. Fixing26 (talk) 19:57, 19 August 2021 (UTC) Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

@Fixing26 FYI you put two articles into the same discussion. I think the latter of the two can be a QD as it is the same wording as used in the first article so we basically have two identical articles just different titles. Both have really bad grammar and templates etc are not implemented properly. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:08, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Also I believe but I may be wrong, there is only supposed to be one article per discussion based on using the singular “article” in the instructions above and not the plural “articles.” Maybe an admin can comment on this. I know when searching RfD I search for the titles and click on them but adding two articles I can’t search as the second title is not in the heading. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:12, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
@PotsdamLamb: I'm having a lot of trouble with pages loading recently and couldn't quite tell if they were the same at first, I've QD requested the second one as it does appear to be the same. Thanks. Fixing26 (talk) 21:03, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
@Fixing26: You may need to clear your cache on your local computer as it sounds like you are storing too many cached pages (which is the default on windows to save everything. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 21:16, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
@Fixing26 I fixed both the talk page of the user and the malformed QD request. When you put those on you have to remove the RfD tag from the page then use twinkle to put the QD on and it will send it to all the correct places. It should appear in QD now for the one that was a copy. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 21:44, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
Rfd's can have multiple listings in it. You do so by copying the article line that gets outputted and changing the article in it to the 2nd article. I have fixed the listing. -Djsasso (talk) 16:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
@Djsasso Is that what the "group" is used for? I have never used it, but I also see it in reference creation. Where would I find an article that explains that? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 18:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Yes, that is what the group is used for. You put the title of the article that is the one that is in the Rfd page title. So that the link in the notice you put on the 2nd page goes to the right place. We don't bundle articles together a lot because the pages need to be very related because if they aren't likely to be deleted for the same reason then it becomes a bit messy to read if people are saying keep #2, #5 & #1 for example. They should be pretty likely to all be deleted or all be kept. But we have had discussions where 100s of articles are included in the discussion. Though that many was extremely rare and not likely to happen again now that we have consensus against automated creation. -Djsasso (talk) 18:55, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
Ok. So one issue I noticed is when I get the email notice about this discussion being changed, it comes up that it is not found. It brings me to the page that says it is not yet created and I can start it. There is no page history. Is this a drawback to having two articles in the same RfD discussion? This is where it takes me Wikipedia:Requests_for_deletion/Requests/2021/Ameer_vayalar. Should I just do a redirect to this conversation? PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 19:07, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
I don't think so, that looks like an issue with the disambiguation brackets. I will look to see if I can see why it is happening. Could you copy and paste the actual URL it is giving you to edit that page? I don't get email notifications so I don't have an example myself. But yeah a redirect would be fine. -Djsasso (talk) 19:09, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  • DELETE: Definitely made up. When I see the first reference that leads to a google search page, followed by a link to everybody wiki and not one of the other links shows any notability and I know we’ve had a lot of articles like this in the past where they got deleted. I see this as advertising and a hoax. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? (Pronouns: He, him, his) 20:05, 19 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Self promotion with no reliable sources meeting GNG. -Djsasso (talk) 16:39, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete. No independent sources, and mainly self-promotional. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 21:54, 24 August 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:57, 26 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Resulted in deletion

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Not notable Peterdownunder (talk) 11:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

Anshuman Tiwari

Anshuman Tiwari (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think the artist is notable. I can't find much reliable sources that cover the artist. Note that the musical artist should not be confused with the journalist of the same name, en:Anshuman Tiwari. Fixing26 (talk) 11:18, 12 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Delete as not notable. An obvious advertisement, probable self-ad, twice deleted before as QD. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:25, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete not notable. Yahya (talk) 16:35, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my User talk 19:08, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. Most probably created by person himself. TrendSPLEND (talk) 19:18, 14 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete Not notable. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 20:02, 14 August 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 11:18, 19 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Redirected. --Ferien (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Transmasculine

Transmasculine (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Similar case to Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2021/Transfeminine. I don't see it as being notable enough for its own page, and I think a redirect to non-binary gender would serve better than a page. Fixing26 (talk) 19:15, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Comment You could just redirect it. No need for a discussion if its uncontroversial but since its created I would say Redirect. -Djsasso (talk) 19:18, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Yes, redirect. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:50, 12 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Agree. This information can be put into bigender, so a separate article on this subject is not needed. SkeletalDome$ (talk) 15:32, 15 August 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:15, 18 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Quickly deleted by User:Macdonald-ross.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:46, 13 August 2021 (UTC)

Mr.Birmal Hembram

Mr.Birmal Hembram (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I can't find evidence of notability with coverage in reliable sources. Fixing26 (talk) 19:30, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion



This request is due to close on 19:30, 17 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Ferien (talk) 20:13, 17 August 2021 (UTC)

Sagar Wahi

Sagar Wahi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems promotional and not notable. I can find little coverage of the subject outside of one interview and some short comments by him in news articles that otherwise don't mention him. Fixing26 (talk) 14:18, 10 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete Very obviously an advert of the person. Not notable and advert. Macdonald-ross (talk) 11:58, 12 August 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 14:18, 17 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Ferien (talk) 17:51, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Nivedita Dadu

Nivedita Dadu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not appear to be notable. Cites Wikipedia as a source. Little coverage in reliable sources, when searching for sources I only find articles written about skincare in non-RS. Fixing26 (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:45, 11 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC)

Mohammad Amanullah

Mohammad Amanullah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject doesn't appear to be notable. I can find little news coverage of him. Take note that the name is similar to en:Mohammed Amanullah when searching for reliable sources. Fixing26 (talk) 03:20, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Delete. Not notable at all. Might be part of an advertiesmental (is that the word?) article string I am investigating. Elytrian - Talk 05:49, 4 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete. Not notable. Yahya (talk) 16:54, 9 August 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 03:20, 11 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Much as I am in favor of supporting young profesionals, who have just graduated in a journalism-related field I also have to hink about Wikipedia, an Simple English Wikipedia in particular. SEWP was the second hit on Google, right after the site of the magazine. This clearly shows that ontability/ (as in indpeendently reviewed, by a third party) isn't there yet. So, the only real option here is to delete. As a counterexample: en:The Siberian Times is a Website about news about Siberia, that has been running since 2012; by now stories get picked up by other news channnels...--Eptalon (talk) 00:10, 9 August 2021 (UTC)

ProSubGame

ProSubGame (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable. Creator seems to have some relation with the company. Fixing26 (talk) 12:25, 2 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Keep Good afternoon, colleagues. I'm an independent author on Wikipedia. Not affiliated with the magazine manufacturer in any way Halywod50 (talk) 13:34, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Hi there, can you explain why you believe the subject of the article is notable, as to better help the closing admin and others to understand your opinion? Fixing26 (talk) 22:29, 3 August 2021 (UTC)
Media and news agencies are being blocked in Russia. Young journalists are graduating from universities who have nowhere to go. Censorship in Russia is getting bigger. I believe that it is necessary to support the new media.Halywod50 (talk)
  •  Delete - No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010Talk 18:33, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:25, 9 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 03:58, 8 August 2021 (UTC)

Shreya Sharma

Shreya Sharma (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find coverage from reliable sources or in many places for that matter. When searching for her in regards to news, all I can find are some articles by her. Doesn't appear to be notable. Fixing26 (talk) 01:52, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Speedy Delete - No reliable source available to confirm notablity, except for some social media link. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 05:09, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Quick Delete - IAmSwiz (talk) 12:45, 1 August 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete Unclear about what reliable sources are listed there. Darubrub (Let me know) 16:09, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete - cannot find any evidence of any notability - Articles at EN are for a child actress and an advocate so neither related here. –Davey2010Talk 21:14, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:52, 8 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Ferien (talk) 20:45, 7 August 2021 (UTC)

Ashish Mehta

Ashish Mehta (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I can't find coverage of this person in reliable sources. The article itself cites some questionable sources that don't appear to be reliable, such as ANI News. There are some other sources, but they don't make it clear if they're referring to the subject or numerous other people with similar/the same name. Fixing26 (talk) 17:43, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • delete - no reliable source to confirm notablity. --C1K98V (💬 ✒️ 📂) 06:15, 1 August 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:43, 7 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  -Djsasso (talk) 14:59, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Sayeed abubakar (poet)

Sayeed abubakar (poet) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject has claim to be notable, but doesn't appear to be. Also note, there appears to be a copy of the article at Sayeed Abubakar (Poet) Fixing26 (talk) 22:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

How so? Fixing26 (talk) 14:09, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
All is cited and there seems no issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Thegameshowlad (talk • contribs) 15:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
They may have citations, but there appears to be 3 of them (the last one being repeated multiple times) and not reliable. Fixing26 (talk) 18:36, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • The problem with this is the lack of independent qualified opinions about the person. Without that, notability cannot be decided. Also, it's obviously useless to have sources in a language few of us can read. I mean to say, do have some common sense. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:55, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete no apparent coverage in reliable sources. --IWI (talk) 22:47, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete per ImprovedWikiImprovment. Also the poet's article (bn:সায়ীদ_আবুবকর) on bnwiki was deleted twice. --আফতাবুজ্জামান (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:42, 4 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

Robert Terell

Robert Terell (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find evidence of notability and coverage in reliable sources. Fixing26 (talk) 17:50, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete non-notable. No coverage. --IWI (talk) 13:25, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete not a notable person. Thegameshowlad (talk) 15:40, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:50, 4 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 08:35, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

England–Wales–Scotland–Northern Ireland-Republic of Ireland 2030 FIFA World Cup proposed bid

England–Wales–Scotland–Northern Ireland-Republic of Ireland 2030 FIFA World Cup proposed bid (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There's news articles about it, but they don't appear to demonstrate that the proposal is nothing more than a thought by the Irish Football association at one point in time, not WP:LASTING. Fixing26 (talk) 14:33, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Keep It is been launched and I see no issue in having it here. The UK government supported this in March. It’s a lot more than a proposal from the Irish FA. Thegameshowlad (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
    There's some coverage of the bid, but it's all from early March 2021 from what I can see. It's not worthy of an article imo, at most a mention elsewhere on the Wikipedia. Fixing26 (talk) 14:42, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
    The FA have officially launched it if you google ‘support for 2030 England bid’ you will find it on the 4th link down (it won’t let me post it here as a spam filter has blocked it) Thegameshowlad (talk) 15:01, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
    Again, everything I can see is from early March 2021. I don't see it being notable enough for its own article yet. Fixing26 (talk) 15:40, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
     Comment: Looks like a W:WP:TOOSOON article to me. Darubrub (Let me know) 15:45, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Yes, "Toosoon". It's not even a bid yet. Macdonald-ross (talk) 18:37, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete As above, just too soon for this topic.--Gordonrox24 | Talk 01:06, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:33, 4 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Simply being nominated for an award is usually not grounds for notability...--Eptalon (talk) 19:57, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Cinderella boy Part 3

Cinderella boy Part 3 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to lack notability. I can find no sources covering it and only record online being imdb Fixing26 (talk) 13:26, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion


This request is due to close on 13:26, 30 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 19:55, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

Kathyrine Baisas

Kathyrine Baisas (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I can't find anything online that proves notability. Fixing26 (talk) 09:59, 23 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Delete as non-notable. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my User talk 00:20, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Connected with the above item, and also not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:39, 24 July 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 09:59, 30 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 07:33, 29 July 2021 (UTC)

Rakibul Hasan Mahmud

Rakibul Hasan Mahmud (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to lack notability - I can't find any articles from reliable sources about him. Fixing26 (talk) 21:24, 21 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • When this article was created there was no reference about that page. Now there added some references to that article. Please don't remove or delete this page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.25.250.245 (talk) 22:02, 21 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Can't find reliable sources either. Rubbish computer Ping me or leave a message on my User talk 08:18, 22 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Non-notable. Delete. Yahya (talk) 03:49, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Not notable, also, why not Quick Delete? Elytrian - Talk 17:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  • I've just declined a quick deletion request of this page as the RfD is ongoing. I have no problem with another administrator deleting the page or closing this RfD early if they feel it's necessary. --Ferien (talk) 18:03, 23 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Obviously not notable, and obviously a QD. What's it doing here? Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:42, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
    I would've asked for a QD but the page does claim that the subject is noted for his work on music and writing, so I didn't think it was appropriate to request a QD. Fixing26 (talk) 21:36, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Qiite Notable, I think this page not to be deleted.— Preceding unsigned comment added by UnoBochaganj (talk • contribs) 09:12, 24 July 2021 (UTC)— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page.
  • Have ongoing source on page. Keep this page for improving Wikipedia.— Preceding unsigned comment added by রাকিবুল হাসান মাহমুদ (talk • contribs) 09:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page.
  • Should be kept as there i've seen some references. Why it should be deleted?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Jahid Islam7 (talk • contribs) 09:30, 24 July 2021 (UTC)— This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page.
    Hi there. There may be sources, but they don't appear to be reliable, which is needed to show that the subject is notable. Fixing26 (talk) 13:38, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Comment: Looks like the 3 users above this comment just made their account for their votes at here. MathXplore (talk) 09:39, 24 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Checkuser observation: The accounts Jahid Islam7,রাকিবুল হাসান মাহমুদ|রাকিবুল হাসান মাহমুদ, UnoBochaganj are single-purpose accounts that are likely the same person. I will leave it to the closing admin how to take their votes into account. Two of the three only have one edit, which is this RfD.--Eptalon (talk) 14:22, 24 July 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:24, 28 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 19:57, 25 July 2021 (UTC)

Shanya das

Shanya das (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable other than alongside the founder and company. Fixing26 (talk) 16:44, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete. A 19-year-old undergrad looking for publicity. Nothing yet is notable about her. Ambition in the young is good, but achievement is one of the things needed for notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:43, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete Not notable. Rubbish computer (Talk: Contribs) 16:10, 18 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Delete per @Rubbish computer:--JTZegers (talk) 23:50, 19 July 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:44, 24 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. QD by Macdonald-ross, as negative unsourced BLP/attack page; independent of that deletion, I don't know of many notable elementary schools--Eptalon (talk) 10:04, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Robert Randall Elementary School

Robert Randall Elementary School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable at all - author seems to have created article with some sort of WP:COI, article appears quite biased too. Fixing26 (talk) 18:04, 16 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Delete Most elementary schools are not notable, and this article provides no evidence that this one is. BlueMoon65625 (talk) 18:21, 16 July 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete. A clear-cut case. No evidence of notability. Macdonald-ross (talk) 05:28, 17 July 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:04, 23 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. No objections --Ferien (talk) 21:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC)

Kamran Ahmed

Kamran Ahmed (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I can't seem to find much coverage of this person. Their imdb page seems to suggest they only participated in the production of 2 films and I can find little coverage of such. Fixing26 (talk) 21:45, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 21:45, 18 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --IWI (talk) 23:07, 3 July 2021 (UTC)

National Computing Intelligence Olympiad

National Computing Intelligence Olympiad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: After looking at a similar Rfd, I looked to see if I could find coverage of the organization as a whole. I can't find anything in the media and thus feel it fails WP:GNG Fixing26 (talk) 19:14, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Delete. Fails notability, and obviously put in to support person above. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:51, 26 June 2021 (UTC)

Many schools have participated in that olympiad. [1][2]Knowledgedonor (talk) 14:07, 1 July 2021 (UTC)
That does not make it notable. There must be coverage of it, not just schools noting they participated in it. I'd suggest you look at WP:GNG for more information. Fixing26 (talk) 08:59, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
Case study by Santanu Productions. Lang=Marathi[3] School and college listings.[4]भारतकोपोर्टल.com[5]Knowledgedonor (talk) 12:40, 2 July 2021 (UTC)
I should clarify what I mean by coverage - media coverage. A study is not media coverage that generates notability. It's just not notable by our standards, and requires media attention before an article is published. Recommendations and a case study is not proof of notability. Fixing26 (talk) 23:22, 2 July 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:14, 2 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  -Djsasso (talk) 14:00, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Xenogender

Xenogender (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable by WP:GNG. I can't find coverage of it in reliable sources, and sources cited in the article are mostly papers and wikis, the latter not usually being reliable. Fixing26 (talk) 17:42, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Its a nice and fluffy gender-related term. But I don't see it used a lot in the more mainstream discussions. So finding a useful definition, that is also verifiable is probably difficult. In short:delete--Eptalon (talk) 18:08, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Yes, I agree. It's an invented term not used much. So not notable. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:01, 21 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 17:42, 27 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 22:49, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Rahul Rits

Rahul Rits (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Can't find evidence of notability, what I can find from searching his name is mostly his social platforms, no media coverage. Fixing26 (talk) 10:30, 14 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:30, 21 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 01:21, 17 June 2021 (UTC)

Josh fight

Josh fight (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Didn't last WP:LASTING. All media coverage I can find from reliable sources were from the days prior and the few days after it took place, nothing much since. Fixing26 (talk) 16:45, 6 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete This page seems to be notable and it has notability but not a lot of references so maybe delete. so we should do a regular deletion discussion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:444:201:9e70:ac9f:9625:7a50:b191 (talk • contribs) 14:43, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    If it's notable enough for Wikipedia then it shouldn't be deleted. Deletion is not for clearing up pages with a few references. --Ferien (talk) 16:33, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
    I don't believe the event is notable. I'd suggest you read into WP:DP for further information on deletion discussions, rules and more to help you begin. Fixing26 (talk) 19:22, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Keep - Really, again? --IAmSwiz (talk) 01:33, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
    There's been no reliable coverage of it since, the media coverage I can find is all from about the timing of the event - it was a passing fad with some initial coverage which ended quickly and thus not notable. Fixing26 (talk) 19:05, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete. A single event designed for publicity. Despite that, it got little publicity, and was a passing fad which has already passed. Not encyclopedic. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:06, 16 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:45, 13 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Promotional article Peterdownunder (talk) 08:13, 22 June 2021 (UTC)

Calmerry

Calmerry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Only sources in article are quite opinionated articles in a list format. Fixing26 (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete The article seems more of an advertisement for the service. Not worth keeping, in my opinion. Etoza (?) 16:46, 10 June 2021 (UTC)
 Delete: The refs just list the various articles that have this specific platform mentioned. PDLTalk to me!OMG, What have I done? 06:31, 11 June 2021 (UTC)
 Keep a simple article about a notable subject. it has sufficient coverage for a simple wikipedia. however some excessive details may be removed. --Sorrow3 (talk) 10:07, 14 June 2021 (UTC)
 Keep I added several sources which show the importance of the subject. I suppose the service is useful and sufficient enough to be appropriate for Wikipedia. --Palipolis (talk) 13:07, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:24, 17 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 11:24, 29 May 2021 (UTC)

Chandan Madan

Chandan Madan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks notability, seems to be mostly local media coverage Fixing26 (talk) 10:53, 20 May 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete. Could not find any reputable sources about this person.PotsdamLamb (talk) 08:52, 24 May 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:53, 27 May 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. 

The World's Major Belief Systems

The World's Major Belief Systems (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Original research, lacks reliable sources and doesn't seem to be notable, I can't find it anywhere else either Fixing26 (talk) 22:00, 3 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  •  Delete per above. ShadowBallX (talk) 22:01, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
  • probably an attempt to get en:Major religious groups to this Wiki. Yes, there are 7-8 "large religious groups" (Christianity,Islam,Judaism, Hiduism, Buddhism,"Folk Religions" (Chinese folk religion, Japanese Folk religion, Korean folk religion)). So: In its current form, the article needs improving, and we can talk about the title/where to put it, but the subject is clearly notable. en:Religious studies are also about comparing these different belief systems. Since dleetion isn't cleanup, I suggest we rework this into a viable stub..- clear keep--Eptalon (talk) 22:54, 3 April 2021 (UTC)
    Yes, there's the problem of having no sources, and the text probably being copied form an unattributed source. I have started World religions (which is a partial translation of the EnWp article). One option would be a redirect, to get rid of the unattributed content...--Eptalon (talk) 09:26, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
    A redirect would work too. Fixing26 (talk) 11:16, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
  •  Delete. Unsourced spiel put up in a single edit and almost certainly copied from an unacknowledged source. It's a case where the lack of credits is critical, and notability is not a defence because it is POV and probably a coyvio. Macdonald-ross (talk) 08:37, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:00, 10 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Quickly deleted under the A5 criteria; the page was not written in English --IWI (talk) 14:19, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Kolektyvizacija

Kolektyvizacija (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not in English or Basic English. Fixing26 (talk) 14:16, 4 April 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:16, 11 April 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Resulted in keeping

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. --Eptalon (talk) 08:55, 4 July 2021 (UTC)

Katrin Dierolf

Katrin Dierolf (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks notability, I can't see why it requires a page instead of a mention on another page about one of the water polo teams. Fixing26 (talk) 11:09, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Keep There are a number of articles by this editor that don't meet notability requirements, but the subject of this one played in the World Championships so meets WP:SPORTSBASIC. -Djsasso (talk) 11:35, 28 June 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:09, 5 July 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Resulted in other (redirect, merge, etc)

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Redirect -Djsasso (talk) 14:56, 5 August 2021 (UTC)

Transfeminine

Transfeminine (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't appear to be notable. When there are sources, they don't appear to be reliable and mostly cover it only along with non-binary. I suggest either deletion, some sort of merge or just a redirect to non-binary Fixing26 (talk) 18:14, 28 July 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • Redirect to Non-binary. Has some sources but not enough, so the information should be in that article. Darubrub (Let me know) 00:01, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep Just a cursory news search brings up Salon, Cosmoplitan, Healthline, Veterans Affairs, The Advocate, Scientific American, etc. --Gotanda (talk) 23:04, 28 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Non-binary; can be covered there. --IWI (talk) 22:57, 29 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Keep or redirect 8Y0 (she/ey; shey/shem) (user/tlk/ctrbs) 00:50, 30 July 2021 (UTC)
  • Redirect to Non-binary. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:21, 30 July 2021 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:14, 4 August 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Redirected to Bisexuality -Djsasso (talk) 13:54, 29 June 2021 (UTC)

Multisexuality

Multisexuality (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Fixing26 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The article uses quite complex English and has some rather questionable and opinionated sources that I wouldn't call reliable. I don't think it's notable as a subject either? Fixing26 (talk) 16:21, 18 June 2021 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

  • As to sexual orientation, either I am straight, then I am only interested in the other gender, or I am homosexual, then I am mostly interested in my own gender, or I am bisexual, then it's both of the cases. This article here has some complex language:"...the attraction towards at least more than one gender" - thats imprecise at best, and confusing. Note: I am not a gender activist, so I don't really see the difference to poli,omni-,multi-,etc sexuality. In short: delete--Eptalon (talk) 17:27, 18 June 2021 (UTC)
  • In terms of identity, as the creator of the article, I'm primarily trying to do awareness about the term. It may have controversial implications. I just simplified the best I can the article to keep it. Obviously, I formulated a generalized speech while transcripting the article with an amplex jargon. Multisexuality and monosexuality are quantifiers, while bisexual and homosexual/heterosexual are somewhat qualifiers. As a polysexual (more specifically torensexual) individual, I feel represented by multisexuality, while at in some edge I'm homosexual, in the other hand my attraction is towards multiple genders. And that's the meaning behind multisexual. I will ask my friends how can I improve the article to make it more simple the best we can. --Kautr (talk) 05:13, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
    The nomination is not due to it having controversial implications. We have plenty of such. The issue is notability. I understand you're trying to raise awareness of it, but I wouldn't say it's notable. Not every sexuality/gender/etc is notable enough for its own page, and needs coverage from reliable sources. At most, I'd say making it a redirect to bisexuality (as done on en.wp). Fixing26 (talk) 10:30, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
    I'd say it's notorious in MOGAI community and neologistic/microdemographic-centric movements (those who focus on microlabels/neolabels). It has sources. We could make it an expansion/extension in bisexuality or bring bi+ to simplewiki. Still, the item in Wikidata of it is used to describe all the bi+ terms without making it seem invalidificatory of pansexual people, for example, as bispec is problematized by some of them.--Kautr (talk) 16:54, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
    Once again, I understand you're trying to raise awareness of its difference to other sexualities, but it doesn't fit Simple Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The wikidata page on it, which was created by you, doesn't make it notable and seems to just be describing what's on the page here. It lacks coverage in reliable sources and seems to require 'expert' knowledge of bisexuality to be aware of it. Fixing26 (talk) 21:27, 19 June 2021 (UTC)
    I'm not going to speak on the subject of notability, as that is just cause of the global lack of literacy. But I'd like to add that bi.org, for example, doesn't use multisexuality's definitions for bisexuality's descriptions. For the general population, which really doesn't concern so much about these struggles, they are all the same. Multi- and bi- (or m-spec and bi-spec) overlap many times in inclusionist spaces (bisexuals of the blade), sometimes you see they have similitude with false equivalency, other times they are simply the same and other times dissimilar. Well, that's it, I discoursed a bit on this. I cited the definition from wiktionary so you could check that bisexuality at some point really encompassed multisexuality within it, but nowadays it can be the opposite and vice-verse. Then it can be its own thing. Some people come out as multisexuals for its unambiguous amplitude, you may say it's not meant to be a standalone term but it's a spectrum. Bisexuality can be a quantifier but its origins, as a sexual orientation, merge homo and hetero. Multisexuals are able to reclaim bisexual but some don't want. --8Y0 (she/ey; shey/shem) (user/tlk/ctrbs) 14:36, 20 June 2021 (UTC)

┌─────────────┘

  • I understand what multisexuality means, but I can't see how it's relevant to the RfD - especially in regards to the issue raised. In regards to putting information about it on the bisexuality page, I'm mostly suggesting that due to it's similarities to bisexuality (not to say they are the same). Fixing26 (talk) 15:04, 20 June 2021 (UTC)
  • Well, it redirects to bisexuality on En, and I suggest we do the same. Macdonald-ross (talk) 07:03, 22 June 2021 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 16:21, 25 June 2021 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
  1. ↑ "Computer Intelligence Olympiad - Schools in Thane - SVPT". svptsaraswati.com. February 2018. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
  2. ↑ "Achievements Panbaiinternationalschool". panbaiinternationalschool.com. 8 April 2016. Retrieved 1 July 2021.
  3. ↑ "Proactive - Computing Intelligence Olympiad CIO Marathi Case Study by Shantanu Productions". www.santanu.biz. 17 July 2018. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
  4. ↑ "Computing Intelligence Olympiad, Thane (2021)". www.schoolandcollegelistings.com. Retrieved 2 July 2021.
  5. ↑ "Computing Intelligence Olympiad". भारतकोपोर्टल.com. Retrieved 2 July 2021. {{cite web}}: Check |url= value (help)
Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Fixing26/RfDs/Nominated&oldid=7743422"