Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Love Ghost (band)

Love Ghost (band) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable band, cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails en:WP:NMUSIC and GNG, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:56, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Pocket Queen

The Pocket Queen (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable musician, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails NMUSIC and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 17:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Rolly Lambert Fogoum (2nd nomination)

Rolly Lambert Fogoum (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable boxer, Fails en:WP:NBOX and GNG, Was deleted at EN too (en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rolly Lambert Fogoum) –Davey2010^Talk 17:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

• I had no idea this was closed just yesterday however I don't know if participants were aware of the EN AFD etc so leaving as is, If it weren't for that I would've CSD'd this AFD/reverted, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ben Gluck

Ben Gluck (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable director, Article was deleted in 2018 on EN ([1]), Fails GNG –Davey2010^Talk 16:48, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry

St. Thomas Anglican Primary School, Badagry (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, Fails NSCHOOL and GNG, –Davey2010^Talk 16:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Wilberfoss Primary School

Wilberfoss Primary School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, Fails en:WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG –Davey2010^Talk 16:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:08, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Miss Universe Mandalay

Miss Universe Mandalay (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DIVINE has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: It appears to fail WP:GNG DIVINE 15:24, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Probably the same sock fam that's created en:Draft:Miss Universe Mandalay, Cannot find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 18:03, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jo Warne

Jo Warne (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: English acress (1938-217) known from EastEnders. Rather than doing a QD, I'd prefer a discussion. Eptalon (talk) 09:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Article was created by a Vanderpumpstan sock, and there are the usual issues they leave behind. Use of poor sources, like birth/death/marriage indexes which should not be used as direct sources (how can a reader be sure this is the same person?). Lots of red-links that need to be cleaned up. Excessive references all over the place. Decidedly non-simple language. The EN version of the article is two paragraphs, two sources and probably a far better start for here than this mess. If someone is willing to spend the time to clean up after this prolific sock farm, and on the other articles they have dumped here, more power to them. There's enough of a mess that I feel deletion is warranted. Ravensfire (talk) 12:53, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
• 1938-217? Didn't know it was possible to be -1721 years old. In all seriousness,  Delete. This page is the opposite of simple in pretty much everything.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 13:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per Ravensfire, I held off CSDing these on the belief that "an article is better than nothing" but given the issues pointed out by Ravensfireabove imho en:Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over really is the best solution here. –Davey2010^Talk 14:30, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Anna-Jane Casey

Anna-Jane Casey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: English acress, born 1972. Nominated for QD (created by blocked/bannerd user). Rather than QD I would prefer a discussion. There are EnWP and ItWp article. so, keep, delete? Eptalon (talk) 09:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep It's been cleaned up and not quite as bad as Venderpumpstan sock usual articles. Ravensfire (talk) 13:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - Whilst I appreciate Ravensfire efforts this was still nonetheless created by a sock so with that in mind this is still better off deleted. –Davey2010^Talk 14:32, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:09, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Natalie Casey

Natalie Casey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: English acress, with enwp article. Rather than quick-deleting (G5- created by blocked/banned editor), I'd prefer a discussion, so: keep or delete? Eptalon (talk) 09:06, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete This is another example of the mess that Vanderpumpstan socks leave behind. Use of poor sources - birth/death/marriage indexes, IMDB, topic searches for websites. Excessive amount of sources for the same fact. There's a place in the article where they use the exact same source, three times, for the same sentence! (See 36, 37, 38 as of this version. Lots of redlinks. Filmography mostly not supported by the article and way beyond what's in the EN version. The language is generally not very simple. This is a cleanup timesink disguised as an article. Better off to delete this and copy over the EN version verbatim. Ravensfire (talk) 13:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per Ravensfire, I held off CSDing these on the belief that "an article is better than nothing" but given the issues pointed out by Ravensfireabove imho en:Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over really is the best solution here. –Davey2010^Talk 14:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:06, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Freddie Foreman

Freddie Foreman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Let's do an RfD, we are looking at a convicted criminal, with an EnWP page. There are quite a few references. Article was nominated for QD (created by blocked/banned editor). So, dear community, keep or delete this one? Eptalon (talk) 09:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Aside from the G5, this article is a mess. The existence of the EN version of the article is noted, but when you look at it, it's far cleaner, uses decent sources and is actually simpler than this version. Here we've got sources like marriage and death indexes (no way to verify that this is the person listed there, those are not considered reliable sources). Filmography is mostly unsupported and of trivial, minor roles. The article uses primary sources for too many places. Serious cleanup is needed from what the Vanderpumpstan sock left here. Ravensfire (talk) 12:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per Ravensfire, I held off CSDing these on the belief that "an article is better than nothing" but given the issues pointed out by Ravensfireabove imho en:Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over really is the best solution here. –Davey2010^Talk 14:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:05, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ronnie Knight

Ronnie Knight (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Convicted criminal, died recently, has article at EnWp FrWp. Rather than quick-deleting (Created by banned/blocked user), I'd prefer a discussion. So: keep or delele? Eptalon (talk) 08:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Article was created by a Vanderpumpstan sock, and there are the usual issues they leave behind. Use of poor sources, like birth/death/marriage indexes which should not be used as direct sources (how can a reader be sure this is the same person?). Lots of red-links that need to be cleaned up. Excessive references all over the place. Decidedly non-simple language. If someone is willing to spend the time to clean up after this prolific sock farm, and on the other articles they have dumped here, more power to them. There's enough of a mess that I feel deletion is warranted. Ravensfire (talk) 12:51, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per Ravensfire, I held off CSDing these on the belief that "an article is better than nothing" but given the issues pointed out by Ravensfireabove imho en:Wikipedia:Blow it up and start over really is the best solution here. –Davey2010^Talk 14:28, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

First United Methodist Church (Mabank, Texas)

First United Methodist Church (Mabank, Texas) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kk.urban has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nothing in this article shows notability, and the only sources provided are the church website and an entry in a county directory. HOWEVER, sources about this church do exist. The three I found were published in 2023 (after this article was written, in fact) and talk about this church's vote to leave the United Methodist Church denomination, the causes and effects of this, and the background history of this particular church. However, I'm still not sure if this coverage is good enough for a Wikipedia article. So, notable or not? Kk.urban (talk) 05:51, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

The sources are:

• The Disunited Methodist Church, Texas Monthly, November 2023
• Inside the Methodist Church Divide in Texas, Axios Dallas, September 2023
• Trying to heal after church disaffiliation woes, UM News, June 2023

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• The United Methodist Church seems to be one of the two main Protestant churches in the US, the Southern Baptist Convention looks like the other. If we are now talking about some disagreement over ideology (the mainline church believes that ..., they don't), and them havingsplit / wanting to split, this will be extremely difficult to describe. Also compare the several million people of the mainline church to the perhaps few hundred, to few thousand of the breakoff church. If they break/ broke witzh tradition, and now stand on their own, they will likely not be notable. And also. Wikipedia is likely not a good place to discuss doctrine...- In short: delete--Eptalon (talk) 16:41, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Deaths in December 2000

Deaths in December 2000 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Bad redirect, makes no sense Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 01:49, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep The page redirects to the December deaths section of the article for the year 2000. It gives the reader the information they are looking for, therefore it is not a bad redirect.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

  Didn't realize that withdrawing@FusionSub Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 20:40, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

When was the first tablet invented

When was the first tablet invented (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Me Da Wikipedian has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: We are not a Q&A site Me Da Wikipedian (talk) 01:47, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete unencyclopedic.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:55, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - Per nom. Yottie ^=talk= 07:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
• redirect to Tablet computer. Redirects are W:WP:CHEAP.Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:46, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Eco-Social Development Organization

Eco-Social Development Organization (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Yahya has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: There is no significant coverage; sources either provide routine coverage or are not reliable. Seems like promotional. —Yahya (talk • contribs.) 18:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep , the subject is notable, got two awards related to their niche,1st award and, 2nd award Link-1,link-2.

The following articles are significant coverages that are not just passing mentions and are independent of the subject.

1. Uncdf=Link-1,
2. Dhaka Tribune=Link-2
3. Company Mission Info from a Govt. website when they had collaboration with BD Govt.= link-3
4. Devex=Link-4
5. Research paper on ESDO published by a Senior Reporter Afrin Jahan From Bangladesh Television = Link-5

--Niddleggol (talk) 20:36, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ziaul Hoque Polash

Ziaul Hoque Polash (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Tanbiruzzaman has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Created by globally locked user. However, this article doesn’t pass WP:NACTOR and WP:ANYBIO. –TANBIRUZZAMAN (💬) 17:38, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2027 MotoGP World Championship

2027 MotoGP World Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A bit too soon for an article in my opinion, and the 2026 page is already at RfD. Can't be A4'd though so RfD it is. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:00, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 08:00, 14 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Roma people in Georgia (country)

Roma people in Georgia (country) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't think this needs a whole article of its own. --Ferien (talk) 17:37, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:37, 13 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

9000 (number)

9000 (number) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unencyclopedic - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:42, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep I've made the article better, so the issue should be fixed now. --Ferien (talk) 17:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:42, 13 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

EmailSanta.com

EmailSanta.com (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Félix An has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced and basically empty. The main English article is already as simple as it gets. Félix An (talk) 12:15, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as per my original reasoning and others' reasoning below. Félix An (talk) 06:23, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Having an article on the English Wikipedia is not an argument to not have one here. I have added a couple of references and simplified the text a little. --Yottie ^=talk= 12:34, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete While noms arguement is for the most part no longer valid, looking at the sources, one looks reliable (The Irish Times) but the other ref looks to be another tabloid which may not be reliable. Even then the two sources don't tell me that the subject is notable enough. Also searching the name isn't giving me any results aside from marketing and promotion stuff for the website.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:32, 6 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Already available on standard Wikipedia, Just need to add more reference and simple content here. --आकाशJhaJi 15:27, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:15, 13 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2026 Formula One World Championship

2026 Formula One World Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No need for a 2026 page to exist, MotoGP article hasn't been created so no where to redirect too, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Comment – Why is the nominator referring to MotoGP? 5225_C (talk • contributions) 01:51, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

  Because the nominator copied/pasted the same rationale and didn't spot the different name, I suspect 5225C will now take me to ANI over this simple mistake, Wouldn't be Wikipedia if they didn't. –Davey2010^Talk 09:40, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete The article does not cite any sources, and too soon for an article for the 2026 season when the 2024 season is not even over yet. @Davey2010: Did you copy the reasoning from Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/2026 MotoGP World Championship without changing it accordingly? Jolly1253 (talk) 04:50, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

  No shit sherlock. –Davey2010^Talk 09:41, 8 May 2024 (UTC)

• Formula One World Championship exists and I would no qualms with this being redirected there if preferred, No objections to deletion either, Was advised on my talkpage to leave these open so have done so, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2027 Formula One World Championship

2027 Formula One World Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No need for a 2027 page to exist, MotoGP article hasn't been created so no where to redirect too, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 18:00, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Formula One World Championship exists and I would no qualms with this being redirected there, Was advised on my talkpage to leave these open so have done so, Many thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 11:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2026 MotoGP World Championship

2026 MotoGP World Championship (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No need for a 2026 page to exist, MotoGP article hasn't been created so no where to redirect too, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 17:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• What? The reason given for deletion is just incoherent. It is saying a MotoGP page doesn't exist, yet it is given as a reason on the discussion for the MotoGP page it is referring to.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 08:15, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

  • What? The only incoherent comment here is yours, Again the main MotoGP article doesn't exist so this article cannot be redirected to it and we're only in 2024 so as such a 2026 article is not needed .... how is that incoherent to you?..... –Davey2010^Talk 10:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    Oh, I understood it as the page for the MotoGP championship, not about the MotoGP in general. It makes a lot more sense now, sorry about that.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:36, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

    @FusionSub No worries and actually I apologise for not being as clear as I should have been - On EN MotoGP and MotoGP World Championship both redirect to Grand Prix motorcycle racing but redirecting it there wouldn't make sense as there's not enough content?, I don't know its all one big mishmash on EN. Many thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 12:12, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete per nom. It doesn't feel right redirecting it as Grand Prix motorcycle racing doesn't have enough content about any MotoGP topics to make it a good redirect. Also a bit too far in the future.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 07:46, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jasmine Sherman

Jasmine Sherman (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Running to become Greens presidential candidate for US elections is significant but beyond that, they don't seem to have any coverage. --Ferien (talk) 17:53, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - The subject does not appear to be notable. --Yottie ^=talk= 17:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
• KEEP - Jasmine Sherman is the runner up to Jill Stein for the Green Party’s Presidential Nomination. They have also ran in the Green Party of Alaska’s Primary and the Peace and Freedom Party’s Primary, and she hasn’t been ruled out as a nominee. She has achieved the nomination of the Unicorn Party. She is very much notable.--user:LordBirdWord'
•  Delete - No notability beyond being a distant second place for a third party nomination. Longestview (talk) 15:07, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Not notable --आकाशJhaJi 15:21, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:53, 12 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Behzad Qasemi

Behzad Qasemi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Yottie has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject does not appear to be notable. A quick search returns no results of note. --Yottie ^=talk= 17:42, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete as no evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 17:44, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:42, 12 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:Persondata

Template:Persondata (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This template has been deprecated since 2013 and has finally been removed from all articles. There isn't much use having it, even as a placeholder. We could implement an abuse filter like en initially did, but it was even removed from there 2 years ago. --Ferien (talk) 14:59, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not used anymore and not going to be used going forward. --Yottie ^=talk= 18:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as was deprecated moons ago in favour of WikiData, not needed anymore sadly. –Davey2010^Talk 16:46, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete To simplify things. -- Magioladitis (talk) 14:28, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:59, 12 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Abdullah Yolcu

Abdullah Yolcu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: From the article, I don't see how this person is notable: Studied, then went on to promote one specific branch/school of Islam. It was originally nominated as Qiuick-deletion (cross-wiki spam). I propose to do a discussed deletion instead. So, thoughts? Eptalon (talk) 09:37, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Cross-wiki spam, Subject fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 10:10, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as outlined above. Yottie ^=talk= 19:13, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Fails GNG --Michaelglassy (talk) 14:53, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:37, 12 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Incinerate (song)

Incinerate (song) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG A1Cafel (talk) 14:57, 4 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:57, 11 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Marie Docher

Marie Docher (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: appears to fail WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:19, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agree with nom fr33kman 20:38, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:19, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Julie Baschet

Julie Baschet (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:11, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agree with nom fr33kman 20:39, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete fails WP:GNG --आकाशJhaJi 16:18, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
• Looking at the French-language article: This is the case of an artist who came under the influence of a sect, and who was then a victim of abuse. At the time, she was in her early 30s, and her spiritual advisor (who founded/led the sect) was in his 60s. Using different techniques (love bombing, brainwashing, etc), she becomes his lover, and a it seems, his sex slave, for five years. There are cases of sexual abuse of children (documented case: 13/14-year-old girls), where she's also involved. There's a process against the founder (Gabriel Loison) in 2014. Loison is sentenced to ten years in prison, she is acquitted. The French article has a number of reliable sources. So, likely, the subject is notable. If kept, it needs a better translation though. I'd tend towards a keep.--Eptalon (talk) 07:31, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

  The French article might be fine but ours doesn't pass muster so unless someone (wink) it should be deleted. fr33kman 18:12, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

  I have added one or two sentences... Eptalon (talk) 18:54, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:11, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Mayor of DG Khan

Mayor of DG Khan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DIVINE has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Being a mayor of municipal corporation which is local government. I believe it fails WP:GNG. DIVINE 09:21, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom - Not sure if this is relevent but according to EN (en:Dera Ghazi Khan) there is no mayor ?... I'm too tired to figure it out, Anyway can't find any evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 09:35, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

The article does not suggest that there is no no mayor in Dera Ghazi Khan. Mayors are generally notable and we have hundreds of articles about them. Category:Mayors. There are independent references. Keep.Rathfelder (talk) 22:47, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Respectfully @Rathfelder, Tell me which part of en:Dera Ghazi Khan lists anyone as a mayor, the infobox there currently states "Mayor of DG Khan None (Vacant)", Also regarding your last point; mayors aren't inheritably notable and as such being a mayor doesn't grant you a free pass to an article.

Also only 2 sources in this article mention a "Nazim" and both of those give completely different names (Malik Muhammad Nazim, Mandi Tehsil Nazim and Muhammad Nazim),

You say There are independent references but you've clearly not looked at them because had you done so you would've found out not one source in this article mentions this supposed Nazim mayor. –Davey2010^Talk 23:34, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: "Mandi Tehsil Nazim" and "Malakwal tehsil nazim" are not names. A "tehsil" is a unit of local government in Pakistan and India. However, "nazim" is both a word for a mayor in Pakistan (see en:Subahdar#Nazim) and a given name (see en:Nazim (given name)). So in these two cases that I mentioned, they mean the mayors of these towns. I just wanted to clear that up. Kk.urban (talk) 00:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

Ahhh okay, Thank you for kindly explaining @Kk.urban I sort of get it sort of don't, The whole articles reads as if it's one person hence my confusement, Anyway thank you for kindly explaining that to me it's much appreciated, Thanks, Warm Regards, –Davey2010^Talk 13:01, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

This is an article about a mayorality, not about individual mayors. I think administrative divisions, like localities, are generally notable. Rathfelder (talk) 08:56, 2 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:21, 8 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

OceanHero

OceanHero (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable search engine, Google results are generally WP:LOCALCOVERAGE, can't find any evidence of any notability, Fails WP:GNG, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 08:24, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Keep It has more coverage than the Ecosia page and cited by WP:RS third party sources. It's credibility had to be mentioned to avoid it being labelled a WP:AD--NadirAli (talk) 09:41, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

As can be seen at en:Ecosia that page has far more coverage but that's irrelevant, I have found but imho these aren't enough to establish notability, you certainly couldn't create an article with these 5 cites, Thanks, –Davey2010^Talk 10:30, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

It has more citations but were removed. It started with five stations and it qualifies as a stub.--NadirAli (talk) 17:25, 7 May 2024 (UTC)

References

This request is due to close on 08:24, 8 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Overclock Cybersecurity Laboratory

Overclock Cybersecurity Laboratory (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks reliable sources to pass GNG. Not notable otherwise. BRP ^ever 18:18, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• In this source (Federation of Information Technology of Iran), this group has been addressed in a dedicated voice, and in this source, (AZAD News Agency) which is the official Persian-language news agency inside Iran, the programs organized by this group have also been addressed. Of course, the final decision is yours and I have only introduced new reliable sources.

In addition, the first source of this article is from a reliable Farsi-language newspaper called Asia News, and the second source is from the newspaper "Mardom Salari", both of which are official Iranian newspapers. Davidjansone (talk) 18:36, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:18, 7 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2024 endorsements in the California U.S. Senate Race

2024 endorsements in the California U.S. Senate Race (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:NOT propaganda A1Cafel (talk) 15:14, 27 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Question: Which part is propaganda? To me it looks just like an unfinished page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:53, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  fr33kman 18:01, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

MemorialCare

MemorialCare (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DIVINE has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Most of the sources look like PR or self-published. Appears to fail WP:ORG DIVINE 21:02, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• There are 21 references. Its clearly notable. Rathfelder (talk) 22:27, 30 April 2024 (UTC)

  Just because there are 21 references doesn't automatically mean it's notable. Those references could all be poor. --Ferien (talk) 15:44, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

  To be honest, I checked practically every reference, and the most of them are promotional, reflecting a company profile rather than secondary sources. Some didn't even work. We should concentrate on quality rather than quantity. DIVINE 16:20, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

  Its a hospital network. It has quite a lot of coverage from independent sources. Hospital organisations are generally notable. I cant see that these references are unusually promotional. Local papers usually say nice things about their local hospitals. Rathfelder (talk) 22:53, 1 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep fr33kman 15:52, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Few of the references cover the subject in-depth or in a way that isn't promotional. --Ferien (talk) 16:05, 1 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per Divine and Ferien - sources are all en:WP:LOCALCOVERAGE, No evidence of notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 10:02, 5 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete All the news coverage are from local sources, and some information is not even correct. This reference (published in 2019) says MemorialCare won the Excellence in Healthcare award. The IHA website does not seem to have 2019 winners for that award. Their website does list MemorialCare as "Most Improved Recognition" however. – Angerxiety^! 12:05, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:02, 7 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  fr33kman 16:25, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Katie Hill (actress)

Katie Hill (actress) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of any notability, Per en:WP:RSPSOURCES; Metro, Daily Express, The Mirror, Youtube, Twitter and Instagram aren't reliable sources and I've not found anything better online, rest of the sources in the article (Ok Magazine, Liverpool Echo, Leeds Live) are general gossipy-crap, Fails WP:NACTOR and WP:GNG –Davey2010^Talk 19:56, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Sources are perfectly adequate for articles about TV actors. Rathfelder (talk) 22:32, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

No they're not ?, if they were they wouldn't be listed at en:WP:RSPSOURCES. –Davey2010^Talk 08:31, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete as an article created by a sock of Vanderpumpstan. This article is in bad shape - excessive sources, details that aren't needed, way too many wikilinks and not sing simple language - even if the creator hadn't been blocked as a sock, everything about this screams typical Vanderpumpstan mess. Ravensfire (talk) 02:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Per Davey & Ravensfire. For now, I personally think it's WP:TOOSON, but they might meet the GNG in the future. DIVINE 04:49, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:56, 5 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE, WP:FOLLOW MathXplore (talk) 12:45, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Template:Check temperatures

Template:Check temperatures (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template, created in 2019, already deleted on enwiki A1Cafel (talk) 03:07, 29 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:07, 6 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 12:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Template:MusicBrainz wiki

Template:MusicBrainz wiki (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pppery has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template. See m:Talk:Interwiki map#MusicBrainz * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:05, 28 April 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 23:05, 5 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Mr. Bean (video game)

Mr. Bean (video game) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail w:WP:NGAME --Ferien (talk) 20:22, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete agree with nom fr33kman 20:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per nom. 3 sources listed are YouTube videos and are essentially filler refs.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 15:36, 6 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:22, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:10, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Mayukh Mukherjee

Mayukh Mukherjee (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG --Ferien (talk) 20:20, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

the page should not be deleted as stated to be a non-notable person. The claim is totally wrong. About Mayukh Mukherjee multiple biography pages in multiple websites can be found. So the request of deletion should be removed. Thanking you :) Joyrukh (talk) 22:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete can't find anything to note Notability fr33kman 20:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

  The page should not be deleted as stated to be a non-notable person. The claim is totally wrong. About Mayukh Mukherjee multiple biography pages in multiple websites can be found. So the request of deletion should be removed. Thanking you :) Joyrukh (talk) 22:09, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

  We are seeing Mayukh on screen from childhood his childhood. He is a renowned and well known person in the Bengali Film industry. We have read his news in many newspapers. Please do not delete his biography from Wikipedia. 115.187.34.37 (talk) 01:21, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

  Mayukh is a famous person. Not only few but multiple people knows about his working career. Multiple people search about him in Google everyday. He is a point of discussion to many. Deleting his biography is not a good choice. 115.187.34.37 (talk) 01:38, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete as none of the sections show the subject's notability, if at all. Codename Noreste 🤔 La Suma 22:12, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

  There are multiple reliable sources for stating that Mayukh Mukherjee is a notable person. around 60 reliable and independent sources are there where we can see his biography. Snigdhakm (talk) 01:08, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:20, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Kerry W. Kirby

Kerry W. Kirby (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ferien has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:GNG, also see w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kerry W. Kirby --Ferien (talk) 20:13, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:13, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Atefeh Bagheri

Atefeh Bagheri (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable actress, Fails WP:NACTOR and GNG –Davey2010^Talk 20:00, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Fails WP:NACTOR --आकाशJhaJi 15:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:00, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

B.N.S.D. Shiksha Niketan

B.N.S.D. Shiksha Niketan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non notable school, Fails en:WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG –Davey2010^Talk 19:29, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete fr33kman 20:40, 3 May 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Delete --Mi-VART (talk) 14:57, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:29, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. Please also see Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2023/Sheikh Rehan Shahid for previous RfD--Eptalon (talk) 07:39, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Sheikh Rehan Shahid

Sheikh Rehan Shahid (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BigKrow has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems not notable enough??? BigKrow (talk) 16:15, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete - Was gonna A4 it but we're here now - No evidence of any notability, Fails GNG. –Davey2010^Talk 16:23, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

  Ahahah, He is non-affiliated with any party. with a political career.  Delete DIVINE 16:26, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

  @DIVINE LOL that made me laugh, Never thought I'd see a politician "non-affiliated with any party", Must be a pretty useless politician then lol, –Davey2010^Talk 16:30, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

  @Davey2010In Pakistan haha DIVINE 17:44, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep He is a government minister, which makes him notable. Also, being a member of parliament for a state with 120 million people makes him notable. There's no requirement that a politician has to be affiliated with a party. Kk.urban (talk) 16:57, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

  With due respect @Kk.urban, Can you provide some sources about them being ministers as they claim? You should take some time to review to find some sources. [2] doesn't work, it's blank, nothing here, this too ?? please review before you vote. DIVINE 17:08, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Now that I look at the sources and the official website of Punjab, Pakistan, it seems that the content of this article is a hoax. This person isn't mentioned to hold these positions anywhere that I can see. Kk.urban (talk) 17:24, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:15, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:40, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

St Leonards Primary

St Leonards Primary (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Davey2010 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not sure if this falls within the remit of A4 so sending here instead - Non notable school, Fails WP:NSCHOOL and WP:GNG –Davey2010^Talk 13:33, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete not notable fr33kman 20:42, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:33, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Important subject, I have extended it beyond a dicdef, needs simplifying though--Eptalon (talk) 07:41, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Workplace bullying

Workplace bullying (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICDEF - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:36, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• This is an important subject, that deserves a good description. I extended the article with content from the enwp introduction, its noticeably bigger now. I think it needs some simplification, but is borderline keepable now.--Eptalon (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:36, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:43, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Geminal dihalides

Geminal dihalides (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:DICTIONARY A1Cafel (talk) 10:34, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 10:34, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:44, 10 May 2024 (UTC)

Methods of detecting extrasolar planets

Methods of detecting extrasolar planets (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

A1Cafel has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: WP:NOT a guide A1Cafel (talk) 03:09, 3 May 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 03:09, 10 May 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests