Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Policy shortcut:
WP:RFD
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
  • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
  • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
  • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
  • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
  • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2017/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

See also: Category:Deletion requests

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review
  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Vicky Kadian[change source]

Vicky Kadian (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Guanaco has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Spam and promotion across many wikis. en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Vhacker Vicky kadian/Archive, commons:Category:Sockpuppets of Vhacker Vicky kadian, and others Guanaco (talk) 19:07, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

Delete. Quite obviously does not belong here per the links to enwp's sockpuppet investigation. DaneGeld (talk) 19:09, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:07, 30 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Queue[change source]

Queue (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zhangj1079 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article isn't necessary, as it exists on Wiktionary already. More of a dictionary definition than an article. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 18:41, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 18:41, 29 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:Batman in amusement parks[change source]

Template:Batman in amusement parks (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Navbox with only one helpful link in the body (two of the live links redirect to pages that have no information about Batman in amusement parks). Auntof6 (talk) 06:33, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 06:33, 29 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


List of the verified oldest people[change source]

List of the verified oldest people (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominated for QD, for not being simple enogh; it is in fact another 3-sentence-mostly-redlinks page, which I put up for deletion. Eptalon (talk) 16:15, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete. No need for this list, and to be fair, hardly anybody on it has an article here. Off to the bin and straight to landfill with this one. DaneGeld (talk) 16:32, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:15, 28 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Template:QD warning[change source]

Template:QD warning (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DaneGeld has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unused template, no purpose or use on this project, appears to have been created as a test. Does not fall under QD guidelines. Only page this was being used on has no purpose on this project, and was changed by the user to something which appeared to be vandalism. The page has been reverted to the last good version and thus, this template is completely and totally obsolete. DaneGeld (talk) 13:20, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Support obviously as nominator, only page this was being used on has no purpose on this project, and was changed by the user to something which appeared to be vandalism. The page has been reverted to the last good version and thus, this template is completely and totally obsolete. DaneGeld (talk) 13:48, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
    • You don't need to "support" your own RFD nomination. That's what your rationale at the top is for. Only (talk) 13:50, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
Struck out my comments and moved them to rationale. DaneGeld (talk) 14:02, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
The structure that this user is attempting to use is unnecessary for Simple English Wikipedia and is a system we should never use. Only (talk) 14:00, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete noms and Onlys - From what I can gather looking at Wikipedia_talk:Bots#QD_bot these were created for some sort of bot .... If I'm being blatantly honest i have no idea on the purpose behind them but regardless other than the creators talkpage they're not linked anywhere so they're obviously not used .... Maybe the creator can come and fill in the blanks for us? .... –Davey2010Talk 15:33, 21 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete all Not a system that belongs on simple.wiki. Should have tried to get consensus before trying to change such a major system. -DJSasso (talk) 03:15, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  •  Delete per Only's comments on Simple Talk and DJSasso. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 02:39, 24 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Dedicated Server[change source]

Dedicated Server (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested QD; two of the three references point to the same domain (So yes, possibly it is adverising). Article itself is written in a pretty neutral tone. Eptalon (talk) 08:37, 19 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete Unfortunate that the QD was contested, I'd call this advertising. Company names mentioned in the text and all the links at the bottom seem to be directing users to comparison services and information sites, without actually explaining what a Dedicated server is. DaneGeld (talk) 23:03, 23 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:37, 26 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


List of animated films[change source]

List of animated films (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Scope too broad. Categories are better for this. Auntof6 (talk) 01:56, 17 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 01:56, 24 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


List of religions[change source]

List of religions (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This is basically, a three sentence article, and a grouped listing of religious movements (most of these movements are red-links, as no one bothered to create articles about them). In its current state, this list is a collection of red-links. Yes, other wikis also have such lists, but they have more editors, and their list are not collections of red-links. The articles on religious movements we have will be grouped in categories about the religion. Those that we don't are porbably not ipmortant/interesting enough that someone bothered to create them. In short: this list is a collection of red-links with no/little extra value. I therefore propose to delete it. Eptalon (talk) 18:49, 15 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete per nom. enwiki has in this place a "list of lists". A single list of this type, even with all blue links, would be too unwieldy. StevenJ81 (talk) 12:30, 18 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep Notable topics get articles. Topics that are notable can have lists. I see no issue with en's list which is essentially the same as ours, lists are helpful, especially considering this one is full of bluelinks. This aversion to lists here is crazy. Redlinks encourage creation. -DJSasso (talk) 11:06, 19 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Keep or convert to page to serve as a well-structured compendium of info for the questing visitor - a red link indicates the existence of the topic (i.e. a specific religion), whereas the categories lack this (having blue links only). This differs from enwiki as I understand it where red links aren't included on lists. -- Deborahjay (talk) 06:45, 22 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Comment: I am not against having such a List, I just think we porbably need to do it differently: Look at the African part of the list: There we have a few section of 'native African religions', which each contain a few entries; all of these are red links. Suppose we move that section to a 'List of Indigenous African religions', and see that we have one-two blue links for each sub-heading? - We could probably do the same for all the varieties of Islam, and only list the 3 main ones on the 'List of religions' page? (Though I have to admit the Islamic part is not as bad as the Africsn one) --Eptalon (talk) 08:42, 22 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:49, 22 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Hisashi Ouchi[change source]

Hisashi Ouchi (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zhangj1079 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not sure if this is notable enough. The article is about a victim of a nuclear accident, and as far as I know, none of the other victims have articles about them (even on enwiki). Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 22:28, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • If this name is a likely search term, we could redirect to the incident page. Otherwise delete. I also note that the incident article doesn't mention any victim names. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:50, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete (or redirect). The incident page on enwiki mentions his name. Whether there is anything on him in Japanese Wikipedia I don't know, as I don't read Japanese. Otherwise, I agree completely with Auntof6, and suspect this is not a likely search term. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:16, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect (all three perps/victims) and Merge into Tokaimura nuclear accident under Section:Aftermath, as in enwiki. The human error and consequences are notable and of interest. -- Deborahjay (talk) 10:57, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:28, 20 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eurodyne (talk) 01:09, 24 October 2017 (UTC).

How to make Felt Handmade[change source]

How to make Felt Handmade (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

DaneGeld has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: We already have an article on Felt, and per policy (at least the English Wikipedia's policy, I don't know if it applies here) Wikipedia is not an instruction manual: "Describing to the reader how people or things use or do something is encyclopedic; instructing the reader in the imperative mood about how to use or do something is not."

This article does not fall under an appropriate QD category, therefore referred to RFD. DaneGeld (talk) 08:01, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Most of what is in the article is also in Felt. Felt has been made since the Stone age, so I guess the amount of tooling involved was limited. Which means: we can add the little info that is in this article to the main page, and then delete the page. --Eptalon (talk) 13:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Incorporate any relevant info, then delete, per Eptalon. Is there any value in any of this going into English Wikibooks, perhaps into the Wikijunior section? StevenJ81 (talk) 14:12, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
    • Delete as is - I reviewed the page and found no relevant info not already included in the page Felt which is encyclopedic in content.-- Deborahjay (talk) 05:39, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:01, 23 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eurodyne (talk) 18:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC).

Untitled Anand L Rai film[change source]

Untitled Anand L Rai film (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article about an untitled movie whose expected release date is over a year away. Although there are refs, it fails WP:NFM because nothing is mentioned that makes it notable. Auntof6 (talk) 22:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete per Auntof6. Future, incomplete, and undistributed movies should not have their own articles. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 23:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Clear case-delete: The movie does not have a name, its release lies in the future, and few/no details are known. Wikipedia is about facts, not speculation. In other words: WP is not a crystal ball... --Eptalon (talk) 08:05, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:14, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:46, 21 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:03, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Bar Luce (Milan)[change source]

Bar Luce (Milan) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Djsasso has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-notable restaurant who fails to meet the WP:GNG. I also think this is likely a situation of conflict of interest. DJSasso (talk) 12:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete. Non-notable restaurant. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 22:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • It is operated by the Prada Foundation, which is probably better known for operating a museum in Milan. Bar Luce is A typical Italian Cafe, designed by famous flim makes, inside the foundation. Which also means that what we likely need is an article on the Foundation/museum, and not the cafe. In milan, you'll probably find many other cafes much like it, but outside a museum setting. --Eptalon (talk) 21:23, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • is the restaurant and caffè o fashion brand Prada, with a very important designer project of Wes Anderson. Please check deeply.--79.44.148.29 (talk) 23:51, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete or redirect. If there is a way that a small amount of the information in here could be incorporated into Prada, then you can redirect to the section where it goes. Otherwise, delete. I'll add that there is apparently an RfD on Esperanto Wikipedia, the only other place an article on this seems to exist. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:19, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:38, 19 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 06:01, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Mohammad Ghorbanpour[change source]

Mohammad Ghorbanpour (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Zhangj1079 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Don't think subject is notable at all; article is likely a machine translation (see "biography" section); no independent sources Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 23:02, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • The perosn who brought it here, is likely a starter with English; also, I don't know, how close English and Persian are, supposing this is a Persian-language artist. Article is of poor quality, and some other language articles are shorter; the artist may be notable, in the area he/she performs, but not ouside (hard to judge). Also, what would we do with a Persian-language reference? - To be kept, this article needs to at least be put into proper English, but even before we do that, the question of notability remains. So probably regard as (self-) promotion, and delete... --Eptalon (talk) 20:24, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Delete. Has a history of QD on enwiki as (a) self-promotion and (b) BLP violation. StevenJ81 (talk) 14:24, 16 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:02, 16 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 05:59, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Jan Lokpal Bill[change source]

Jan Lokpal Bill (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

StevenJ81 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Minimal, unsourced content that seems to be inconsistent with enwiki version. StevenJ81 (talk) 22:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC) StevenJ81 (talk) 22:50, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • The article seems to be factual, and technically correct. Two things that are problematic are its length, and the fact that there are no links to other pages. Also, it was passed in 2011, so it pretty recent. Given its current state we do not lose much, deleting the article. Even if it is only a stub, an article must be able to juszify its existence. This one currently doesn't. --Eptalon (talk) 20:13, 13 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:50, 16 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Redirected. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:55, 21 October 2017 (UTC)

Motorways[change source]

Motorways (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

StevenJ81 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Seems to be a list of Motorways. Do we need this? The singular version (Motorway) already redirects to Controlled-access highway. StevenJ81 (talk) 22:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC) StevenJ81 (talk) 22:46, 9 October 2017 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Lists two entries (both in England). A list of English motorwqys is probably high-maintenance; new ones get built, some are probably renamed from time to time. There are three systems, either there is a flat time-based (usually annual/monthly/...) fee, such as in Austria or Switzerland, for using them, or they are free-to-use, or there is a distance-based fee (some in France, some in Italy). Free-to-use, and distance-based fee are sometimes combined (such as in France). If this is going to be a List of English Motorways, then its high-maintenance, and I think it should be deleted. Is the London circular motorway (M25?) notable enough to get its own article? - Except that it is in London what makes it different from other similar ones in Paris, Berlin,... ? - So definitely a delete. --Eptalon (talk) 09:16, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect - Title not accurate for the article as written. Redirect to Controlled-access highway, same as motorway. --Tbennert (talk) 15:02, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
  • Redirect per Tbennert. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 02:40, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
    Note from person nominating: I'm certainly fine with a redirect; wanted to evaluate content first. StevenJ81 (talk) 15:39, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:46, 16 October 2017 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages[change source]