Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines

1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines

B. Carry out these checks

1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lead.

C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted

1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.

D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability

1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion

Put the deletion tag on the article.

1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
   • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
3. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
   • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.

Create a discussion page.

1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
   • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
3. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
   • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
   • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.

List it here

1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:

   {{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2024/(name of page to be deleted)}}

4. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

If this is too complicated for you, there are some gadgets like Twinkle that you can use. This allows you to do it faster.

Quick deletion

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion policy § Quick deletion

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions

See also: Wikipedia:Deletion review

• The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
• Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
• Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
• Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
• New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
• Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) will not be counted.
• Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete keep".
• If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
• Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.
• Requests for deletion is not a war zone. You can click here for more information, although the page is not in Simple English.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.

• All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions

Jimmy-D

Jimmy-D (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ternera has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Youtube URLs are the only sources. Seems to fail GNG. Ternera (talk) 20:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Bananaphobia

Bananaphobia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Complex, written by LLM, but most importantly, it's a hoax. Nothing like "bananophobia" has ever been scientifically or medically described (not counting the pseudo-medical inventions of newspapers and portals, which of course cannot be the basis for describing the disease). It's more of an AI creation. BZPN (talk) 19:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• There are numerous links to bananaphobia, and many cases are reported and widely available to read online. Whilst I agree this is not a common phobia, simply stating this is a hoax and AI created diminishes the actual issues that are felt by suffers. A simple online search will a show people who auffer from this. I suggest you watch the ITV news reader Charlene White talk about this on Loose Women. It is not for those who do not suffer from this to decide if it exists or not, that decision rests solely with those who do suffer from it. Those who do suffer describe their feelings in detail and these wholly align with the feeling of other phobia sufferers. I am not aware of any articles referencing pseudo-medical inventions in relation to this. 46.183.109.221 (talk) 20:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Just stop lying. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia, and the diseases described here must be medically and scientifically confirmed. We do not describe Internet inventions as real diseases, and interviews on pseudomedical portals or joke reports in newspapers have no significance here. BZPN (talk) 20:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

P.S. there is no entry with this title in any other wiki and it is not mentioned in any of the medical/scientific articles, and enwiki in two biographies only mentions this word as an invention of people. BZPN (talk) 20:21, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:44, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Llyrio

Llyrio (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from declined draft on enwiki - after removing the significant exaggerations, there's not enough to show how this person meets WP:NACTOR - background roles, minor particpation, but nothing significant. Ravensfire (talk) 17:48, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:48, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Hoop Dogz

Hoop Dogz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Copied from a declined draft on enwiki - sources are mainly primary, with one secondary source that lacks significant coverage of the videos. Ravensfire (talk) 17:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:19, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

The Power of Zhu

The Power of Zhu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unreleased film, sources are mainly primary or in-universe. A trailer was released, but apparently this didn't see (wide) distribution. There's one decent source that's about a lawsuit tied to this film (among others), but there's no significant coverage of the film. Article is a direct copy of a declined draft on enwiki. Ravensfire (talk) 17:14, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 17:14, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Misha Williams

Misha Williams (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Ravensfire has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources are primary, nothing to show that WP:NMUSIC or WP:GNG. Merely be associated with notable companies or acts is not enough. Ravensfire (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 15:39, 25 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2022–23 Al-Nassr FC season

2022–23 Al-Nassr FC season (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI article, unencyclopedic. A WP:TNT candidate in my opinion. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 14:15, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete text like "The arrival of Cristiano Ronaldo in December 2022 boosted the team's profile" are AI, How users created new article like this. Raayaan9911 17:08, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete This content is not encyclopedic.--Amina Khan12 (talk) 19:53, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:15, 24 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DSJ Exchange

DSJ Exchange (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability and Self Publish Article Other please check If I am not wrong. Ksy 09:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 09:25, 24 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Elite Rentals Dubai

Elite Rentals Dubai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Looks like company promotion BZPN (talk) 07:37, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No Notability Self Published. --Ksy 09:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Purely promotional content.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 10:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Promotional fluff. Ravensfire (talk) 14:32, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:37, 24 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DigitalYoog Media

DigitalYoog Media (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Company promotion, not notable, complex language. BZPN (talk) 20:41, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Zero Notability and Promotional--Ksy 09:43, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:41, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Lunakai

Lunakai (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Advertising (company promotion), not notable, complex language. BZPN (talk) 20:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

DIDWW

DIDWW (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-Notable Article, This Article was Spam References, Fails GNG Raayaan9911 16:51, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete As per Nominator --Ksy 09:45, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:51, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Daniel Larze

Daniel Larze (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Other please check if I am not wrong Ksy 16:40, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete, not notable, and the only source is unreliable. BZPN (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
• Delete, that is what i am leaning toward.--Not notable.--If one is wondering: is he mentioned in En-wiki articles? No.--Other info at en-wiki: "02:38, 14 July 2022 Scottywong talk contribs protected Daniel Larze [Create=Require administrator access] (indefinite) (Repeatedly recreated)
  17:29, 13 July 2022 Lourdes talk contribs deleted page Daniel Larze (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)
  14:24, 17 February 2022 Bbb23 talk contribs deleted page Daniel Larze (A7: Article about a band, singer, musician, or musical ensemble, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject)
  09:25, 17 February 2022 Shirt58 talk contribs deleted page Daniel Larze (A7: Article about a real person, which does not credibly indicate the importance or significance of the subject. Obvious WP:AUTOBIO. WP:BEFORE done, no chance that this would pass an WP:AFD - see self-created IMDb entry https://www.imdb.com/name/nm13394251)
  06:42, 10 February 2022 Iridescent talk contribs deleted page Daniel Larze (G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page – to retrieve it, see WP:REFUND)". 2001:2020:32F:E6A2:CC28:ED4F:4CA3:708C (talk) 19:20, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Wikipedia prioritizes verifiability over truth. If the information is potentially true but lacks sources, it can remain.
• Keep- lack of source should not be the only reason for deletion. --Amina Khan12 (talk) 19:52, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:40, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Brothers Furniture

Brothers Furniture (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Looks like advertising (company promotion). Not notable at all. BZPN (talk) 12:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

 Keep The references provided clearly establish the subject's notability. They are not merely trivial mentions but include in-depth, independent, and reliable sources. These references are readily accessible and verifiable. Therefore, I strongly support keeping the article.Needyrude (talk) 12:53, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Promotional and Non Notable --Ksy 09:49, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 12:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Store friendly

Store friendly (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-Notable Article, How users created their articles like this. Fails GNG Raayaan9911 07:58, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This article was advertising too Raayaan9911 08:02, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: This page has references which are mostly profiles so I think so it should be deleted.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:10, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:58, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Vince Maristela

Vince Maristela (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The subject has no Notability Other Please Check if I am not Wrong Ksy 07:34, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: I have checked the subject's notability and it does not fulfill the criteria for notability. So, it should be deleted.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete not seeing anything online to show how the article's subject is notable. Ternera (talk) 15:12, 16 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete, not notable. BZPN (talk) 16:28, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 07:34, 23 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jake Villamor

Jake Villamor (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Zero Notability Please Check if I am not wrong Ksy 18:20, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: This article has limited information and it should be deleted.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:13, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:20, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Jake Villamor is a Filipino actor and internet personality in the Philippines.Ivan P. Clarin (talk) 06:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Iñaki Torres

Iñaki Torres (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 18:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

Iñaki "Aki" Torres is a Filipino actor popularly known played various role in boys lovers along with Miko Gallardo.Ivan P. Clarin (talk) 06:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Note: Moved above the footer.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:40, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Delete: There is no proper referencing for any of the given information.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:19, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kuldeep Sandhu

Kuldeep Sandhu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, no significant coverage in reliable sources. Depextual (talk) 14:47, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:47, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Janmejay (author)

Janmejay (author) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, no significant coverage in reliable sources. Depextual (talk) 14:45, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 14:45, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

D. Kaustubh Sonalkar

D. Kaustubh Sonalkar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, doesn't have significant coverage in reliable sources. I noticed that Kaustubh Sonalkar was quickly deleted before, but I think this page claims notability and may not qualify for QD as advertising, so I started this RfD. Depextual (talk) 14:44, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete: The subject is not notable as it does not have significant coverage in third party references.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:44, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Thomas the Train and 2002

Thomas the Train and 2002 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no significance. Depextual (talk) 01:53, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete non-encyclopedic story.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 16:10, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: non-encyclopedic story without any reference.

This request is due to close on 01:53, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

WikiAlpha

WikiAlpha (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Does not show notability Depextual (talk) 01:49, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator, fails GNG Raayaan9911 20:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:49, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

A$f Dine

A$f Dine (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject is not notable and page is written like BIO and also please check if I am not wrong Ksy 11:55, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. 2601:402:4400:3A90:D35:8D21:711B:BCD5 (talk) 04:49, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Non-Notable Raayaan9911 10:36, 15 December 2024 (UTC)
• This page, dosn't delete, beacause her is in good form —197.255.239.41 (talk • contribs) 21:15, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:55, 21 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

2021 Brazilian military crisis

2021 Brazilian military crisis (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: AI generated essay in mainspace - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:02, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete per nom. BZPN (talk) 20:42, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:02, 21 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

SIM’S Driving School

SIM’S Driving School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 23:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete No Notability --Ksy 09:57, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Baroque house

Baroque house (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: We already have a baroque article, so this short and worthless summary is unnecessary. It does not contain any specific information and is not even related to the title itself (Baroque house). BZPN (talk) 22:30, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Baroque is the name for a time period. In this context we can talk about baroque architecture, baroque music, baroque painting, baroque furniture, baroque sculpture etc. It is clear thatunless we count art historians among us we are not going to get in-depth articles on all of them. It was me who created this page, in 2007. It is clear that what we now call 'baroque' is mostly about churches, but there are some houses in that stlye too. Examples are the Pavionn de l'horloge (part of the Louvre today), Greenwich hospital, or (parts of) many palaces. Just because a page is short doesn't mean it doesn't have a reason for existing. Like wqith Gothic Architecture, the few buildings that aren't Churches/Cathedrals, and that are built in Gothic style, this likely is of similar interest. That there's so little change in the long years its existence just tells me that the article isn't viewed often, or is not of particular interee in extenfing it. Nevertheless I'd favor keeping it... --Eptalon (talk) 14:27, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  The actual content doesn't say anything about baroque houses at all - probably the only solution to keep this article would be to change the content to redirect to baroque. BZPN (talk) 22:38, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:30, 20 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ken G. Winans

Ken G. Winans (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

ImprovedWikiImprovment has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Appears to fail WP:GNG. --IWI (talk) 19:41, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete As Per Nominator --Ksy 10:00, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 19:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ken Nohara

Ken Nohara (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page is like advertisement and Not Notable. Please Check if I am not wrong Ksy 16:34, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 16:34, 20 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Singlewandern

Singlewandern (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Asteralee has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Wording is promotional; none of the websites are notable enough for an encyclopedia page. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 15:27, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 15:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete fails GNG. Ternera (talk) 17:10, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:27, 19 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

William Mobley

William Mobley (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fails WP:NBIO. I don't see significant coverage of the subject in reliable sources. Note: This person is a businessman, not the physician who is the subject of en:William Mobley. This was already at RFD before, but that was a soft delete so it can't be used as a reason to delete this page again. Depextual (talk) 02:38, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per Nominator Raayaan9911 08:40, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Per Nominator. ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 08:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:38, 19 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

LAGERBOX

LAGERBOX (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem very notable. Does not meet WP:NCORP. Depextual (talk) 02:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Not notable. 🎄 Adelaideslement8723 🎄 14:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:30, 19 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Christine Chandler

Christine Chandler (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Red-tailed hawk has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: A previous deletion discussion concluded with deleting this page. However, per WP:PEOPLE:

A person can be notable if they have been written about in many published secondary sources. These must be reliable, independent of each other, and independent of the subject.

However, all the sources here (aside from an obituary of a relative, which does not contribute towards notability) are from the same publication: Business Insider. Because of this, we do not have many reliable sources that are independent of each other, and this should be deleted for lack of notability.

Red-tailed hawk (talk) 23:31, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Move to Draft:Christine_Chandler - The article is neutrally written, which is a good thing. One of the problems with the last articles is that they were written by trolls.

I agree that it isn’t ready for the main space, but Chris already has articles on several non English Wikipedias. There are plenty of other sources for the Chris page. Anyone who knows even a bit about internet culture knows about her, so she is notable for sure. The article just isn’t ready for the main space yet. Dr. Precursor (talk) 05:04, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: On Simple English Wikipedia there is no Draft: namespace, but it could be moved to someone's userspace, such as yours. Depextual (talk) 05:07, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

That sounds like a good idea. Dr. Precursor (talk) 05:24, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:31, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

References

Old Zonkers

Old Zonkers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable Depextual (talk) 17:44, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Unreferenced plus Non-Notable, How they created their new article like this. Quick Delete A1. Raayaan9911 19:45, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete for A1 in my opinion. Ternera (talk) 20:19, 13 December 2024 (UTC)
• Delete: Unreferenced and also not notable. --Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Template:C.S. Marítimo squad

Template:C.S. Marítimo squad (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating two sports-related navbox templates that each have only one relevant blue link. (In fact, each has only one blue link at all at this time.) Without more blue links, a navbox can't do its job of navigating between related articles.

Templates included in this request:

• Template:C.S. Marítimo squad -- transcluded by one article that isn't linked in the template; also has one redirect
• Template:SC Veendam managers -- transcluded by one article

The C.S. Marítimo template actually appears to be out of date, but updating it from enwiki's current version would result in no blue links at all. -- Auntof6 (talk) 17:12, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:13, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete looks like, most of links are red. Raayaan9911 08:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete A ton of red links, not notable. 🎄 Adelaideslement8723 🎄 14:47, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: Edit: I meant that it is notable but a ton of red links are in the article though. 🎄 Adelaideslement8723 🎄 14:49, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:12, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Shrinetra Pandey

Shrinetra Pandey (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable at all, looks like advertising BZPN (talk) 10:32, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• This is just basic info about the person. A few research articles, YouTube links of the lectures and more info will be uploaded gradually. 47.247.24.82 (talk) 10:54, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Could need improving, no need for deletion. ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 01:41, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Non-notable. I don't see how a reference that contains his e-mail is a reliable source. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 15:31, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment:Right. It doesn't but, it still has a lot of ways to go, the article itself will need improving ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 15:43, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:32, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Mandan

Battle of Mandan (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Shakib ul hassan has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Article fails to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. The event lacks significant coverage in reliable sources, and the existing references fail to verify its details. Much of the content appears speculative and disputed, violating guidelines on verifiability and reliable sourcing. Shakib ul hassan talk! 14:10, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep None of the above reason seems the case it's surely needs copy editing but the article seems to be reliable and it is also available on the English Wikipedia [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mr.Hanes (talk • contribs) 14:36, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  Even though the article is available on the English Wikipedia, that alone doesn’t justify its retention. The presence of significant copy-editing issues suggests a lack of editorial oversight, which can impact credibility. Furthermore, the sources used are overly simplified and lack the depth expected for a reliable article. Reliability depends on verifiable, high-quality sources, not mere availability on another platform. If these issues persist, deletion might be the most appropriate course of action to maintain quality standards. Shakib ul hassan talk! 14:33, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

  Also the redirect link doesn’t lead directly to the article but to another page[2], showing it lacks significance. It isn’t covered substantially and doesn’t even have a separate article on English Wikipedia. Combined with poor sources and copy-editing issues, deletion is the best option. Shakib ul hassan talk! 14:43, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete or possibly add a small amount of information to List of battles in Rajasthan. Not notable enough for its own article. --IWI (talk) 14:43, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Needs copyediting work, but reliable.☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 08:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  Lacks WP:GNG however Shakib ul hassan talk! 14:44, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

• Delete Per nom, I find the Coverage to be less than required on Wikipedia. --Malik-Al-Hind (talk) 10:07, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

• Delete : The article relies on four references, all of which are problematic:

Reference No.	Reference	Objection
1	*Sardula-vamsa-prakasa [Volume 1] By Raghunātha Siṃha Śekhāvata (1977)	Page number not provided; citation verification failed.
2	*Śarmā, Mahāvīra Prasāda (1980). History of Torawati (in Hindi). Prakāśana Samiti	Page number not provided; citation verification failed.
3	*Yadav, Kripal Chandra (1967). Ahīravāla kā itihāsa, madhyayuga se 1947 ī. taka (in Hindi). Akhila Bhāratīya Yādava Mahāsabhā, Vārāṇasī ke Nimitta Hariyāṇā Prakāśana	Page number not provided; citation verification failed.
4	*Bisāū digdarśana	Not a reliable source; page number not provided; citation verification failed.

NXcrypto Chatting 18:49, 14 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:10, 17 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

MCB Bank

MCB Bank (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Mudamang has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This Article is completely advertisement for the subject and I could not find any independent sources except company's published reports. Mudamang (talk) 15:31, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• keep - enwiki article seems suitably sourced. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 18:22, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

  References on enwiki don't show notability here. The article here needs to be sourced. -- Auntof6 (talk) 19:09, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

  "Notability is a property of a subject and not of a Wikipedia article" from en:WP:Notability. Depextual (talk) 19:11, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Depextual: Are you saying that if an article on one Wikipedia has sources, then no other Wikipedias need sources on the corresponding article(s)? -- Auntof6 (talk) 08:07, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Auntof6 They should have sources, but I don't think it's a reason for deletion. Depextual (talk) 14:29, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep per Lee Vilenski. If the sources exist, then this would be notable even if they aren't cited. Red-tailed hawk (talk) 01:12, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Notable. Adelaideslement8723 (talk) 01:30, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Clearly, Notable Pakistani Bank. We don't need a deletion. Raayaan9911 13:25, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:31, 13 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Pasteur Bizimungu

Pasteur Bizimungu (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Hockeycatcat has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not simple, not adhering to Manual of Style. Hockeycatcat (talk) (changes) 05:56, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• He is clearly notable. Article needs improvement, not deletion. Rathfelder (talk) 21:46, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep See WP:BEFORE, specifically "If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD." That is the case here. Both complexity and nonconformity to the MOS can be fixed. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:11, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 05:56, 14 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Fiorenzo Manganiello

Fiorenzo Manganiello (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The Article written is Purely advertisement for subject and could not find any independent sources Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 14:56, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep: First of all, It does fulfill the criteria for WP:GNG as majority of citations are from secondary reliable sources and do not have passing mentions only. There are complete articles on the subject and about his business. It does fulfill the criteria for WP:GNG. It specifically cover the clause titled as ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." Also, it adhers to clause "There is no fixed number of sources required since sources vary in quality and depth of coverage, but multiple sources are generally expected." So, I think so it should not be deleted.

Also, this article has been written considering wikipedia guidelines. I would suggest that you check sources by yourself instead of simply putting tags of deletion on it.

consider it according to WP:THREE, [3], [4], [5]], [6]], [7] all qualifies as secondary sources and are following the guideline provided in WP:GNG stated as ""Significant coverage" addresses the topic directly and in detail, so that no original research is needed to extract the content. Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material." Fanalrino (talk) 15:18, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Administrator note: CU-requested (Special:Diff/9949254). MathXplore (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Keep: The subject is notable and have enough coverage in reliable sources. I have also edited the article and did my research on this guy. This subject is notable and have coverage by a number of newspapers that are trusted sources. I have also checked the history of editor who have added the AFD tag. The edtitor has a history of adding tags without doing proper research and even was warned to stop adding AFD or even STUB tags on articles instead of improving it. I think so, this subject has a lot of coverage and it should have article on wikipedia. --Azwarjuttone (talk) 14:57, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: CU-requested (Special:Diff/9949254). MathXplore (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

@MathXplore, I have nothing to do with this user who created this page and also nothing to do with the subject as well. According to deletion page, if there is an article that needs editing, it should be deleted instead of nominating it. So, this was the reason, I edited this article and then posted my comment on this deletion page. In the end, I will say that you can check but it is bit discouraging for new editors to face scenarios like this. --Azwarjuttone (talk) 15:46, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

• Keep: I have researched about the subject and it is notable. Therefore, i am convinced that the article must be kept as it does not appears to be promotional.--Amina Khan12 (talk) 07:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: I have already mention above that Other Please Check If I am not wrong that I put the article in RFD. Any how, I have done a little more research on above Subject. The all above three editors having close relation with the subject or they have Un disclose of payment with the subject. My Proof (As you can check above subject name has been pervious tried 4 time to get it publish on Eng Wikipedia Language. And Group of new editors trying to Vote KEEP) as the group of editor trying to do on this page, again I am saying Other please check if I am not wrong on this --Ksy 16:06, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

 Comment: This is really unprofessional that you are blaming someone by simply typing check if I am not wrong. I am quite sure that you are paid by someone just to make this deletion. I told earlier I have nothing to do with the subject or even the editor who created this project. I gave my honest review on the basis of my research. From your edit history, it is quite evident that you are paid first to add the AFD tag and then just making it a personal grudge and blaming others without any proof. You are harassing so I would request that if you want to provide argument, do it on the basis of research and solid arguments just like I provided by doing research on this subject. It is not according to rules that you just add anything and then at the end type, check if I am not wrong. I have checked your deletion tags history, you have made this deletion discussion personal which is not allowed. I am sure that you are an undiclosed paid editor who just wants to sabotage without providing any strong point. If you have a reasoning backed by solid arguments, I would love to discuss this subject's page.--Azwarjuttone (talk) 18:18, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:56, 13 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Korean People's Army

Korean People's Army (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no meaning for the reader. The only information it contains is one sentence that such a service existed. No source whatsoever. BZPN (talk) 21:42, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep As Article is expended with source I change my VOTE from Delete to Keep -Ksy 21:51, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

  @BZPN, Auntof6, and Kuskrey: I have expanded the article, with a source. Any thoughts on the article in its current state? --Ferien (talk) 19:26, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Ferien, I think it can be left in its current appearance. Thank you for expanding and improving it! BZPN (talk) 19:35, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Now there is no reason to Vote in Delete as page is expanded with source I Change my Vote from Delete to Keep Thank you Ksy 20:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep per ferien, and another point: Wouldn't a significant army during the Korean war, one of the more famous and notable wars of both the cold war and the 20th century be notable? it would be best to add to it instead of deleting it. RiggedMint 15:04, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

  The question should be is the topic notable, not is this a good article. Rathfelder (talk) 17:01, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

  In which, the article is very much notable. RiggedMint 23:47, 2 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete I might even have QD'd under option A2 -- the content is basically just a rephrasing of the title. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:18, 7 December 2024 (UTC)  Keep Article has been improved. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

  Why should it be deleted over to be improved though? It's clearly an important article because it's the armed forces of the DPRK. RiggedMint 18:50, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

@RiggedMint: Improvement is better, yes, but I give my opinions based on the current state of the article. We can't know that an article will be improved until it actually happens. --Auntof6 (talk) 22:24, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:42, 6 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Siverek (1925)

Capture of Siverek (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

JJPMaster has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: See all of the other RfDs for "Capture of..." articles by Canoooo.4 from today. JJP_Master (she/they) 23:02, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• User talk:Canoooo.4 is clearly working on the history of Kurdistan. I think they should be helped to do that. Rathfelder (talk) 17:35, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:03, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:02, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Ergani (1925)

Capture of Ergani (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:54, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:54, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Maden (1925)

Capture of Maden (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:53, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:26, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:53, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Lice (1925)

Capture of Lice (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:49, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete As per nom --Ksy 20:23, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:03, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete as per nom Mr.Hanes Talk 05:40, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Cleanup is Not Deletion Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 19:34, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - I was unable to find any sources indicating that this battle was particularly notable, and as such, the article fails to meet criteria to be kept. That being said, some of the content in the article may be merged into an article about the greater war/conflict. Griff (talk) 21:20, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:27, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:49, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Palu (1925)

Capture of Palu (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Random Sources that redirected back to article, How users created new article like this. Both are non-notable and unreliable references Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 09:13, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - I was unable to find any sources indicating that this battle was particularly notable, and as such, the article fails to meet criteria to be kept. That being said, some of the content in the article may be merged into an article about the greater war/conflict. Griff (talk) 21:18, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Capture of Bingöl (1925)

Capture of Bingöl (1925) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 22:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete - I was unable to find any sources indicating that this battle was particularly notable, and as such, the article fails to meet criteria to be kept. That being said, some of the content in the article may be merged into an article about the greater war/conflict. Griff (talk) 21:23, 2 December 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:30, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:45, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Battle of Rawandiz

Battle of Rawandiz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Keep Please see WP:BEFORE Raayaan9911 Talk to me! 15:34, 1 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Article gives no info about the battle itself. I would suggest userfying as I did with similar ones that are currently at RfD, but this article was created by an IP. --Auntof6 (talk) 08:02, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Alqosh Massacre (1832)

Alqosh Massacre (1832) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. Actually looks like a substub. BZPN (talk) 21:47, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:47, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Khatare Massacre (1832)

Khatare Massacre (1832) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Unsourced article. Lack of proper wikitext formatting and a properly formed lead. In this form, the article does not provide readers with relevant and informative information. BZPN (talk) 21:46, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep WP:BEFORE point C - deletion is not cleanup --Ferien (talk) 22:01, 29 November 2024 (UTC)
• Userfy and encourage the editor to combine the related ones. Combining would make better articles. --Auntof6 (talk) 07:31, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:46, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Ardalan Emirate

Ardalan Emirate (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article has no sources or wikitext formatting. There is no major value for the reader, just a few minor mentions of dates. It looks more like an edit test and substub. BZPN (talk) 17:24, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep The subject is notable. Lack of sources and formatting can be fixed. However, it could be deleted as a direct copy from enwiki. --Auntof6 (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  Also, I'm not sure the term "emirate" applies. -- Auntof6 (talk) 23:44, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  I really don't understand the purpose of leaving articles like this. If we leave it like this and do not delete it, it will remain in this for an indefinite period of time until someone decides to correct it (but we don't know when). An article like this really has no real value to the reader. The topic is notable and encyclopedic, but it is not enough to leave this article in such a state. It is actually an out-of-context fragment of unformatted and unverified information. BZPN (talk) 07:50, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 17:24, 4 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Farsad (rapper)

Farsad (rapper) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I have checked in detail could not find any Notability for the subject other Please check If I am wrong Ksy 08:37, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Keep Farsad is one of the notable Persian rapper, as in Iran news don't cover the rappers because hipHop is illegal and Iranian sources are under control of Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps

But some super notable sources coverd Farsad which I added for him *Timsar* (talk) 08:44, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

No offence, Lets other Editors decide, as I have already mentioned Please Check If I am Wrong. Wikipedia follow rules and regulation.

And according to wiki rules you can improve the article but your Vote don't Count. Ksy 09:08, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

We don't have any rules that article maker can't vote in Wiki! I did it a lot on farsi wiki and English wiki, Thanks for the corporation *Timsar* (talk) 09:22, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrator note: @Kuskrey: If you're going to tell another user that they can't !vote, you need to cite the rule that says so. I believe that the article creator is allowed to !vote. Did you have some other reason in mind? -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:48, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

ok, if you say so, it is added in my knowledge. Ksy 10:53, 24 November 2024 (UTC)

• Administrator note: Comments moved into the discussion section. MathXplore (talk) 09:24, 24 November 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete The English language sources clearly are not good enough for notability. I translated the the Persian language sources using Google Translate and they seem promotional, and not really in depth coverage. Also, this musician does not seem to be particularly popular according to online metrics like the number of "fans" on the pages linked. Depextual (talk) 22:53, 26 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Depextual in Iranian sources anyone can't promote news or something else, As I told the News source are under control of Islamic Revolutionary Guard and hipHop music is illegal so that's so clear *Timsar* (talk) 03:59, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  I think Berouz and vaghte sobh are significant mentions but they seem to repeat the same content. I don't know whether they're independent of the the subject, but it's not really enough unfortunately. As for the number of fans, you're right and I probably shouldn't have said that, but what I was trying to say is that there's not really any indication outside this page that he would meet the notability standards. Depextual (talk) 18:45, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  Because, Vaghte Sobh news is one of the most notable Iranian sources and other sources are getting rewrite of them sometimes and I would insure u that in Iran Farsad is notable *Timsar* (talk) 13:18, 30 November 2024 (UTC)

• Comment people can be notable with significant mentions in multiple, independent/third-party, secondary sources and Farsad is qualified enough. please check here. In addition, number of fans or pages link Are not criterion of Notability!

*Timsar* (talk) 04:30, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

Administrator note: The user is CU-blocked (Special:Diff/9932626). MathXplore (talk) 01:11, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

• keep I have also checked this page. I didn't see any voidation. I didn't come here to make a fool of myself. As an editor, I will definitely do this. This page is following a Simple English Wikipedia policy. I will say that it should be kept Mmukhas (talk) 08:16, 28 November 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: User is blocked/locked. MathXplore (talk) 01:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete lacks significant coverage in multiple reliable sources to meet GNG, doesn't meet any other notability criteria.--BRP ^ever 01:56, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
• Keep as a rapper he has got General notability guideline specially in Iran and some article in English wiki talked about him please check here; here; here; here. and also he has three other article in several languages on wikipedia

  Farsadx (talk) 07:06, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: CU requested. MathXplore (talk) 12:56, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

  Administrator note: User is blocked/locked. MathXplore (talk) 01:10, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 08:37, 1 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Kamaria

Kamaria (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I wanted to improve this article but there are barely any reliable source with information that can fix or grow this page. I'd say this needs to be redirected to Yadav due to clear lack of general information. The content not written with NPOV. BRP ^ever 15:55, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Keep:@BRPever No sir/ma’am there is no need for the deletion of this page. All the sources I’ve put in are reliable and I’ve also cross checked all the sources that I’ve put in the article, on ground level. They are all a 110% correct. Also the content is written with NPOV as all the things I’ve written is either facts(with backed sources) or an assumption which is almost close to correct. Nlkyair012 (talk) 16:23, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

  @Nlkyair012 is there any sources that's not a list or just passing mentions. Without such sources, it's very hard to tell if the content of the page is actually verified information or simply speculation. Please list some among the 58 sources you have added. BRP ^ever 12:19, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

  Yes sir/ma’am I surely can give you some of the such sources from the *59 sources which are concise, not in Brief which is exactly what you want to verify the information

  1. Sons of Krishna: The politics of Yadav community formation in a north Indian town. By Michelutti, Lucia (2002)
  2. The Vernacularisation of Democracy: Politics, Caste, and Religion in India. By Michelutti, Lucia (2007)
  3. Caste in Question Identity Or Hierarchy? 2004
  4. Hindu Tribes and Castes, Volume 1 By Matthew Atmore Sherring
  5. Census of the N.W. Provinces, 1865
  6. Lokokti evaṃ muhāvarā kośa Kannaujī ke sandarbha meṃ 1994
  7. Statistical Descriptive and Historical Account of the North-Western Provinces of India by Edwin [Felix] Thomas Atkinson · Volume 4, Issue 1 1876 And many other more sir/ma’am I would kindly request you to please check all the citation in Kamariya Ahir (Yadav) page sir I assure you that you’ll find many detailed and descriptive sources too the above one are just some of them. Please sir/ma’am I request you to kindly remove this page for RfD 🙏🏻 and please lock and prevent users to vandalise this page Thankyou.

• Nlkyair012 (talk) 16:50, 27 November 2024 (UTC)

  Most of these sources provide not enough detail on the content and are basically passing mentions. These are clearly not enough to meet the notability or even to verify the content of the page. BRP ^ever 16:38, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

  I'd say that @BRPever should read the sources carefully, I read them and those are not just some mere passing mentions but actual detailed thing. And verified source for the things written in main article. I'd lean toward keeping the page but also imporving it a bit. Anyways great job @Nlkyair012 atleast for as a newbie 2401:4900:5247:3792:B8B2:5DC6:87B8:C779 (talk) 05:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  Which one are you talking about? Don't expect me to read all the books with bare mentions, just point out some significant sources with in depth coverage on topic which is reliable. BRP ^ever 10:48, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  What I'm saying is you aren't reading books sources at all, you have to scroll down to find more details man. And ye alright then you should check [8][9][10] there are many details here in these 3 books too and besides I checked more citation on the article there were many sourced which had more info then just some bare mentions I have checked and verified them all and yeah you can't expect each and every source to have detailed mention obviously some would have bare mentions too. 2401:4900:5277:87B8:4C86:CC65:8401:C0F6 (talk) 11:18, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

  I am not sure about the reliability or significance of the thesis, but the other two are just mentions and mostly describes other topics. Is there any significant coverage specifically on this subdivison of Ahirs? The sources need to cover the topic significant themselves provide reliable coverage on the topic to meet GNG. I don't see that happening here even now. BRP ^ever 11:33, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  @BRPever, If you wish to avoid appearing biased in your decision to delete this page, I strongly urge you to review the other Ahir subdivision pages as well. I’ve linked them below for your reference. Kindly evaluate their sources and citations to determine if they meet the General Notability Guidelines (GNG). After thoroughly examining them, I request that you take a consistent approach—either retain all the Ahir subdivision pages or delete all of them, as they rely on a similar type of citations and references.

  Here are the pages:

  Hindu Ghosi

  Phatak

  Gwalvanshi Ahir

  Dhadhor

  I I can already anticipate your counterargument—that three of these pages are on the English Wikipedia and not Simple Wikipedia, and thus it’s not within your purview. However, this response would only sidestep the core issue. When you carefully analyze the above-mentioned pages, you will find that they also rely on similar types of sources—some detailed, others brief or passing mentions.

  Additionally, I have personally checked and deeply analyzed the sources and citations used in all these pages. In several cases, the citations and sources do not even align with what is written in the Wikipedia article—what the books or sources say is sometimes entirely different from what is claimed in the articles. In contrast, the pages I’ve worked on maintain a strict NPOV (Neutral Point of View), with all information faithfully written exactly as it appears in the source materials, without any alteration or misrepresentation.

  Therefore, I urge you not to exhibit bias in singling out this page for deletion. Instead, make a fair and consistent decision across all such pages. If the standards applied here are the same, this page deserves the same consideration. 2401:4900:305A:6785:E1C4:3165:AF8B:938D (talk) 13:45, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Comment: This article was moved to Kamariya Ahir (Yadav), with a redirect left behind. @Nlkyair012: Please do not move articles when there is an active RfD. Thanks. --Auntof6 (talk) 10:30, 22 November 2024 (UTC)

  Case was due to close on 16 nov 2024 i thought it was deleted already im sorry Nlkyair012 (talk) 06:55, 23 November 2024 (UTC)

• Delete - that is what i am leaning toward.--An argument that largely works for me: "needs to be redirected [or whatever] to Yadav [or whatever] due to clear lack of general information". 2001:2020:331:9B64:28CF:BA55:332B:3AF0 (talk) 05:08, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep: is what I am leaning toward because I have checked all the sources one by one that is mentioned in the articles and those citations are pretty good and there are not only one citation for a single thing but there are many citations for a single thing e.g. Mulayam Singh Yadav where more than 5 citations added mentions for him being and Kamariya Ahir is there, now those are some bare mentions I agree but more sources means more reliability even if they are bare mentions. And there are some sources around six to five that are very detailed,descriptive and reliable sources rather than Bare mentions and unreliable. Not every citation can have detailed mention yo!

And I guess this discussion should've been closed on 16 November 2024.. what happened Admins?

•  Keep:@BRPever I think it's good, NPOV, and factual and sources are good and well detailed (not every source tho) but still page seems alright.

(Non-administrator observation) This comment is this IP's (2401:4900:1C1B:BC2C:9D00:DB72:173C:F3B7) only contribution on this wiki.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:27, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Keep Well detailed, passes NPOV, good reliable sources. ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 01:49, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:55, 16 November 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

Recently closed deletion discussions

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 06:44, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Victoria Rees

Victoria Rees (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not very notable, lacks significant coverage in reliable sources. Depextual (talk) 02:19, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator - at best, redirect to The Real Housewives of Sydney, as that's the only thing she'd have notability. Too many sources are affiliated with Bravo, and basically primary. Ravensfire (talk) 05:48, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 02:19, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 06:43, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Space Invasion

Space Invasion (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Currently a redirect on enwiki. Simplewiki version also currently has no sources. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 01:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Doesn't have any significance in the article. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:17, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:05, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 06:41, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

David Peck

David Peck (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not very notable. Fails WP:NBIO. Depextual (talk) 22:38, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 01:42, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 22:38, 17 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 06:40, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Sajanka

Sajanka (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Jlwoodwa has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No evidence of notability, and the page's English is not simple. jlwoodwa (talk) 20:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Fails notability guidelines. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:18, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:55, 17 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 06:39, 18 December 2024 (UTC)

Munchmakers

Munchmakers (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page is Like Advertisement and not Notable please check if I am not wrong Ksy 20:21, 10 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Advertisement Raayaan9911 20:55, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Reads like a promotional press release. w:WP:REFBOMB.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 19:05, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
• Quick Delete Promotional spam. Exceeds w:WP:REFBOMB ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 01:46, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 20:21, 17 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 01:34, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Siege of Republic

Siege of Republic (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Depextual has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Subject is not notable Depextual (talk) 20:15, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 20:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:32, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Nature Trammer

Nature Trammer (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

William Graham has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: I don't see any more news stories saying that she is famous for being a model or actor. Not many references and some of them look like they are advertisements. William Graham (talk) 16:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 16:08, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:08, 16 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:31, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Bergmann & Koch

Bergmann & Koch (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: The page is totally promotional and also lack of Notability. Other Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 10:23, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete I don't know if the company is notable, but this article is clearly spam and doesn't show any notability. Depextual (talk) 05:15, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

  No mention at En-wiki. No title at German-wiki.--Delete is what I am leaning toward, after having glanced at 2 sentences in article's lead, and 2 sentences in next section.--Will i read anything else in this Delete-talk, to prompt me, to read more? I doubt it. 2001:2020:311:AEFD:E5D1:FC5A:AC73:5A00 (talk) 16:55, 12 December 2024 (UTC) /2001:2020:311:AEFD:E5D1:FC5A:AC73:5A00 (talk) 16:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

•  Delete Spam. ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 15:50, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:23, 16 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:30, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

St. Michael's International School

St. Michael's International School (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability for School. Other Please check if I am not wrong Ksy 10:17, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Non-Notable, three of references are Japanese but unreliable and non-notable, One references are Non-Japanese, Some of Non-Simple Selection like "External links" are confusing readers who lack of full English learning including children, non-navite and others who learning full English is difficult, Fails WP:GNG. Raayaan9911 08:38, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:17, 16 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:29, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Syrian Air Flight 9218

Syrian Air Flight 9218 (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

TDKR Chicago 101 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Discussion at enwiki looks like the article will be deleted. Not a notable flight since crash has been ruled out w/ Assad arriving in Moscow safely. TDKR Chicago 101 (talk) 21:23, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - I don't think I have ever edited the simple english wikipedia but this has to be said. The entire article is a speculation and none of it has been confirmed. Interstatefive (talk) 02:21, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

• Speedy delete While Syrian Air Flight 9218's status was unknown yesterday, whether it had crashed or not, i decided to create an article. Later, it was reported that Assad arrived in Moscow safely, so administrators needed to delete this article quickly. I also added a summary "If the plane crash hadn't happened there, this article should be deleted. So, it's currently unknown" in the first edit of the article i created Bakhos Let's talk! 05:36, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

Speedy delete Article seems to be based off of rumors, there is no solid concrete evidence here that this flight crashed. Wikipedia does not support Conspiracy theories. @TDKR Chicago 101 Lolzer3000 (talk) 18:38, 13 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 21:23, 15 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:27, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Josiah Akinloye Gboluwaga

Josiah Akinloye Gboluwaga (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Raayaan9911 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Non-Notable Nigerian People, The article doesn't met a WP:GNG. Raayaan9911 11:39, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Per nominator. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 14:47, 10 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Per nominator. Adelaideslement8723 (talk) 01:35, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 11:39, 15 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. w:WP:SOFTDELETE MathXplore (talk) 01:26, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Niteon

Niteon (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BRPever has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Lacks significant reliable sources and fails any other notability criteria. BRP ^ever 11:33, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 11:33, 15 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:25, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

NYANZI LUTHER MARTIN

NYANZI LUTHER MARTIN (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

FusionSub has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Sources don't show notability, unable to find any sources to show any notability. - FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 09:25, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

• Delete - already QDd once. Should be WP:SALTed. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 09:56, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

  @Lee Vilenski: I don't know about other admins, but I consider salting only when an article has been deleted 3 times within a short period. -- Auntof6 (talk) 10:38, 8 December 2024 (UTC)

  This content has been recreated a half dozen times using different titles. I deleted most of them it's a hoax fr33kman 03:51, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

• THE PAGE IS REAL GO ON GOOGLE AND SEARCH INFORMATION IS THERE FROM DIFFERENT WEBSITES, JUST TYPE HIS NAME 41.210.159.5 (talk) 10:51, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
• Delete. Obvious hoax. Depextual (talk) 18:07, 8 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Obvious hoax, and fake info ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 08:56, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:25, 15 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  MathXplore (talk) 01:23, 17 December 2024 (UTC)

Old Dave and Busters

Old Dave and Busters (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Auntof6 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Nominating two pages for locations of Dave & Buster's because they do not claim notability. The pages originally had QD requests, but I declined them.

Pages included in this request:

• Old Dave and Busters
• New Dave and Busters

--Auntof6 (talk) 13:19, 6 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete These are about individual D&B locations, with nothing to show that these particular locations are notable by itself. Ravensfire (talk) 14:30, 6 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete non-notable stores.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 17:45, 7 December 2024 (UTC)
• delete - I do think A4 would still meet here. Whilst these "articles" are somewhat about locations, it's specifically a service that is being offered. A4 covers services, and by spirit is meant to be a catchall for any article about a subject that doesn't ever claim to be notable, rather than just for companies and the like.Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 17:54, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

  I respectfully disagree. If it covered everything, we wouldn't need to list specific things. With QDs, we have to be very exact, not go by the "spirit" of the option. -- Auntof6 (talk) 18:41, 7 December 2024 (UTC)

  I think that since these stores are not notable and don’t have significant coverage, A4 would apply, as A4 refers to anything that isn’t notable whether it’s people or businesses. MonkeesEug176 (talk) 01:33, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

  A4 doesn't apply to just anything. It applies to, and I quote, "people, groups, companies, products, services or websites". If the articles were about the whole company, then A4 would apply. However, they aren't about the whole company, they're about specific locations of the company. I don't think they fit any of the other items listed, either. -- Auntof6 (talk) 05:16, 9 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 13:19, 13 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. A4 Quick delete enacted by Fr33kman Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:15, 16 December 2024 (UTC)

Justin Parsons

Justin Parsons (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Kuskrey has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: No Notability please check if I am not wrong Ksy 18:09, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

you are not wrong. author is spamming all the wikimedia projects with nonsense. Modern primat (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

can be speedy deleted. Modern primat (talk) 21:38, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

This request is due to close on 18:09, 22 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 20:17, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Jewish Voice for Peace

Jewish Voice for Peace (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

QuantumFoam66 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: the following target to this redirect makes absolutely no sense; the target is completely unrelated after looking at the article on English Wikipedia. I can't see this redirect being kept. QuantumFoam66 (talk) 18:53, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete honestly wouldn't be too surprised if this was made to mock a group or opinion of a group. Bad redirect.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 19:03, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete I am pretty sure that FusionSub is right as to why this was created. It could be deleted as vandalism in my opinion. Depextual (talk) 22:02, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete This redirect is nonsensical and should be deleted. The organization itself is notable, however, and this request for deletion should not preclude the creation of an article regarding that entity. Red-tailed hawk (talk) 01:11, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Not notable, bad redirect. ☆ Adelaideslement8723 ☆ 08:46, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete looks like, bad redirect, it could be deleted in weeks How they created redirect like this, doesn't entry any article. Raayaan9911 08:47, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 18:53, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete.  --Auntof6 (talk) 20:19, 15 December 2024 (UTC)

Celina Powell

Celina Powell (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

BZPN has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Not notable, too many personal info, SM links (advertising). BZPN (talk) 10:00, 11 December 2024 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion

•  Delete Doesn't apply for A10 because it's sourced, but from the way it's worded it's nothing more than an attack biography. ✩ Dream Indigo ✩ 10:43, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Attack page. ⯎ Asteralee ⯎ 17:15, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Looks like, Attack Article Raayaan9911 17:42, 11 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete Attack article. Adelaideslement8723 (talk) 01:32, 12 December 2024 (UTC)
•  Delete per Dream Indigo, attack page.- FusionSub (Talk page) (Contributions) 11:00, 12 December 2024 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 10:00, 18 December 2024 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.

---

The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.

Related pages

• All archives before July 2008 - implementation of new system made archives redundant
• Category:Requests for deletion that did not succeed
• Category:Requests for deletion that succeeded
• Wikipedia:Deletion policy
• Wikipedia:Quick deletion
• Wikipedia:Requests for undeletion
• Category:Deletion requests
• Category:Quick deletion requests