User talk:American Eagle/Archive 6

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

hi, you moved the tft page....

to the thin film transistor liquid crystal display page and I just thought that for anyone using simple english it was a bit complicated looking ~ R.T.G 05:29, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well, it's an official title. We don't changes titles. That's like changing "High-definition television" (HD-TV) to "High-quality television" (HQ-TV), it keeps its naming. I hope this explains it. God bless, American Eagle (talk) 05:38, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]
well to me the title is thin display or it is electronically lit colour changing plastic coated thin film transistor liquid crystal moving picture display screen technology which the common term TFT does not describe quite so much. Although the name on en.wiki is that length, the link is simply (simply) TFT-LCD. See [1] ~ R.T.G 05:53, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

DYK nom nom nom

"List articles on this page under the date that they were nominated, with the newest nominations at the top." --Gwib -(talk)- 18:19, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh man, I was moving it right when I saw the "new messages" thing. But thanks. -- American Eagle (talk) 18:22, 21 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

    Dear American Eagle/Archive 6 thank you for supporting my recent RfA which closed as successful. I very much appreciate your support and I will do my best for the community in my new administrator role. Thanks again, FSM Noodly?  

drama and strife

Apologies for bringing "drama and strife" to Simple Wikiquote but that was where Ric asked on his talk page here to be contacted for talking. Up to you and the rest of the community to manage him there. His RfA was inappropriate and I think his conduct on other projects is relevant. Otherwise, I have no opinion. --Matilda (talk) 01:41, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I was more talking about Majorly because (IMO) he's known for that, causing havoc (no offense). I was fine with your original message because it was where he is active. Fine with me, I just want SE:WQ to grow without fighting, but you are free to stay. God bless, American Eagle (talk) 01:44, 23 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User

Hi, can you see Cassandra's talk page please I have a concern over someone's username. Thanks. Yotcmdr (talk) 18:41, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done by Majorly. Yotcmdr (talk) 18:42, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, I was about to get to that before your message even came up. Thank you, Majorly, for doing it. God bless, American Eagle (talk) 18:45, 7 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey

Long time no talk.....we haven't talked in a while.--  ✧ ChristianMan16  05:29, 12 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Yes we do need to stay in touch...in the mean time a bot just reported an IP to WP:VIP and I added more info...would ya check it out please?-- ✧ CM16  04:37, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hey, man, I'd also like to point out the Image discussion on Simple talk. God bless.-- ✧ CM16  04:48, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The idea is to vote on all three idivdually...which I need to do, excuse me.-- ✧ CM16  04:55, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I opposed the final two. I'm still undecided on the first proposal. I think I'll wait to see what others admins think, then weight in. God bless, American Eagle (talk) 04:57, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I supported 1 and opposed 2 and 3.....Option one was, I think, my original idea.-- ✧ CM16  04:58, 17 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

May I please have some help?

I am wasting no time in finding a mentor here on the Simple English Wikipedia. Would you mind teaching me the ways of the Simple English Wikipedia sysop? It would be very much appreciated, thank you very much. --Dylan620 02:53, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome present! (I was asleep when you gave it to me, so I didn't discover it until now.) That should give my account here an edge over my account on the English Wikipedia; I was never given any welcome template there.
I'll get to learning ASAP. --Dylan620 13:30, 6 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank You

The Yotcmdr Barnstar
Thank you for supporting me in my RFA which passed with 15 supports and no opposes. The barnstar may not mean much to you, but your support did to me, thanks. Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 09:02, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Aww, that's a really good message, Yotcmdr. Happy to support. -- American Eagle (talk) 18:12, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

sorry ive been gone

hey buddy, sorry I've been gone so much from WP. School and crap keeps me busy. Sorry I didn't help with the Billy Gram article. Good work on it. Saksjn (talk) 14:01, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple News Issue Two

Issue 2 - 13th December 2008

37,332 editors, 41,432 articles, 109,917 pages.

Announcements ♥ Administrators
User Articles
It's a bumper edition from Kennedy this month, with a round-up of recent and future developments, and also news of a spin-off from Simple News.
In his second article, Bluegoblin7 writes of the new wikicup that has come to the wiki.
Yotcmdr writes about the Good Article and Very Good Article processes and how we need your help in his debut article.
 [Subscribe]
[Dates]
[Discussion]
[The Team]
  • Christianman16 has applied to be an Administrator.
  • Yotcmdr applied to be an Administrator, and was promoted.
  • Matilda had applied to be an Administrator, but was not promoted.
  • Chocolates had applied to be an Administrator, but was not promoted.
  • Gwib had applied to be a Bureaucrat, but was not promoted.
 QandA
  • The QandA. Every month, Kennedy will interview one of Simple English Wikipedia's editors, asking them about themselves, and their opinions on Wikipedia. It is an exciting insight behind the anonymous face of an online username. Las month we debuted with Microchip08. Due up next was Shapiros10 but due to uncontrollable circumstances we have had to postpone this to next month. Instead, Bluegoblin7 takes the reigns and interviews Gwib, who kindly volunteered to keep the section in this issue. Click for his interview:
Gwib's Interview

Everyone at Simple News would like to wish all users at the Simple English Wikipedia a very Merry Christmas and Happy New Year.


--GoblinBot1 (talk) 17:22, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hiya!

I'm back :). Cheers, Razorflame 21:11, 27 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for the late response (I've been so busy), welcome back! American Eagle (talk) 17:53, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Don't worry, I already put that the design was originally by you on the bottom of Razorflame's user page. RyanCross @ 01:59, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

LOL, you can remove it. I don't want recognition, chances are I took parts of it from others as well. No worries. ;) American Eagle (talk) 07:33, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]
 Done. Thanks, RyanCross @ 07:41, 30 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Simple News

Special New Year Edition

39,214 elves, 42,705 reindeer, 112,260 presents.

Annoucements ♥ Plans for 2009
  • You can find the wikicup pools here, tomorow! They were chosen randomly by our judge, Bluegoblin7.
  • Happy New Year everyone!


 [Subscribe]
[Archive]
[Discussion]
[The Team]


SEWQ

Change my page to say I am retired. I can't edit there until tommorow and the enviorement it too dangerous, "friend". VandalFighterFR(V) Bad warning? 01:55, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

{{Wikibreak}} (currently what's on your user page) means you'll be taking a break from Wikipedia for a while and probably will be coming back. {{Retired}} means you're leaving Wikipedia (not to come back). Since you said you're coming back tomorrow, wouldn't {{wikibreak}} be fine? But if you're coming back tomorrow, you don't really even need any template. For me, if I'm going on break, I just don;t edit, period. I don't really add any template. What do you think? — RyanCross (talk) 02:07, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I meant on Simple Wikiquote. VandalFighterFR(V) Bad warning? 03:56, 1 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, again

I was looking to my past with enwp again and I wanted to thank you again for fighting for me that one time, you didn't have to.-- CM16 MLB  08:15, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you ever want to IM me, my IM's are they available information if you want it, just email and ask.-- CM16 MLB  08:19, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
You're welcome. ;) I also replied via email. God bless, American Eagle (talk) 20:30, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Hi there!

Hi, AE! I thought your comment on the proposals to close us was so good that I put it on my Userpage. And also, would you like to comment on my ER? No-one else has commented there. TurboGolf 19:55, 9 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I don't think anyone's ever quoted something I said like that. I will be commenting on your ER shortly. God bless, American Eagle (talk) 02:33, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Comments needed

Your comments are needed.
Your comments are needed.
I have written an apology for enWP here that I intend to present to the enWP community somehow and I would like some constructive criticism please. Please read the "letter" and comment on the "letter" here. Thank you.-- CM16 MLB  07:19, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comments, man. I would let y'all know but they would call it canvassing. I'll try though. What's the worst they can do? I'm already banned. Later.--21:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)

Please stop

Please stop disrupting the DYK process by inserting your personal bias into it and misrepresenting a situation. As an admin, you are held to a much higher standard. I expect that you heed this warning. If you cannot contribute positively to the process, stop contributing to the process. Thank you. Synergy 22:08, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Woah, hang on a second. The first one was agreed upon by Yotcmdr (another admin). So I assume you will be warning him as well? But no, neither of us did any wrongdoing, nor broke any policy, not even an admin-only policy. The second one is absolutely sick. It is unprovable, trivial, and is not even interesting. I have now approved a different DYK nom, which is a positive (okay?). Also, you don't need to treat it as a warning, no policy was broken. Cheers. TheAE talk 23:11, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am not here to debate this with you, but only to point out that you are disrupting DYK and now you've created an RfD that violates WP:POINT. I honestly do not know what you are thinking but I will ask once more. Please stop. Synergy 23:15, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What? What did I "disrupt"? What policy did I break? The RfD has nothing to do with POINT, just read the reason I gave - it had nothing to do with this discussion here. Whatsoever. TheAE talk 23:18, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I read the RfD AE. You contradict yourself near the end of the rationale, and you are using RfD for a content related problem. We do not RfD articles that need improvement, and you should know this. Synergy 23:24, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I did not read English Wikipedia's version nor went through Internet pages on it (for my own safety). I only read through our article on it, and no notability was established on the page. However, I have withdrawn the RfD. Let's move on. Alright? Thanks. ;) TheAE talk 01:42, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Why did you change your signature? TurboGolf 12:22, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, I just had it for too long. I don't like ones that are too weird, but the one I had was too default and boring. Do you not like it? TheAE talk 19:10, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

New editor review

Thank you

Thank you for your support in my RfA which passed 24/0/0. I will do my best to better Wikipedia with the administrative tools that the community has seen fit to grant me. Special thanks to Shapiros10 for nominating me and if you ever need anything, feel free to ask! Malinaccier (talk) (review) 18:03, 16 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Simple News Issue Three

Simple News
Simple News
Issue 3 - 19th January 2009

42,058 editors, 53,245 articles, 124,392 pages.

Announcements ♥ Administrators
User Articles
Another bumper article from Kennedy this month, with not one, not two, but three pages including Simple News, DYK and RfA
This month Bluegoblin7 writes about the GA and VGA processes
In his second article for Simple News Yotcmdr writes about his new WikiProject, WikiProject France
In a third short article Yotty talks about his opinions of the RFA system
 [Subscribe]
[Dates]
[Discussion]
[The Team]
QandA
  • The QandA. Every month, Kennedy interviews one of the Simple English Wikipedia's editors, asking them about themselves, and their opinions on Wikipedia. It is an exciting insight behind the anonymous face of an online username. This month is a bumper edition for QandA, as Kennedy was an idiot and forgot to load the interview last edition! This month will be Shapiros10 and Yotcmdr! Click for their interviews:
Shapiros10 Interview
Yotcmdr Interview
The Commander's Choice

The Commanders's Choice. For every edition, Yotcmdr will be chosing articles that need creating, expanding or being attended to. Here is this edition's list:


--GoblinBot3 (talk) 20:46, 19 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello!

Hello there, AE! You need to put your current signature on your sig page. TurboGolf 06:24, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Haha, thank you! I would've never thought about it. ;) Thank you. TheAE talk 07:25, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ty

Thanks for your editor review I was starting to wonder if I'd ever get one.- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 23:57, 20 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Email

You've got mail! Cheers, Razorflame 18:47, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied. TheAE talk 20:57, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
My reply: Alright. That was my reply to the reply of the email I sent to you. Cheers, Razorflame 21:10, 21 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ping! I've replied to the email. Razorflame 00:49, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Please ignore that last email that I sent to you :). I am going to wait a while longer. Cheers, Razorflame 14:58, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Peterdownunder's Rfa

Thanks for the support - and I really did appreciate getting those barnstars :) --Peterdownunder (talk) 00:02, 22 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Add me?

Could you add me to the list of active users on this site please? I am active from 1PM until 10PM CST and semi-active all other hours. Thanks in advance! Cheers, Razorflame 01:13, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

 Done – I really need to memorize UTC and EST/CST. Thanks for asking me to do it, it gave me some practice. ;) TheAE talk 01:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Yepper! No problems :). Cheers, Razorflame 01:25, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for the nomination. It really meant a lot to me.

Thank you for nominating me in my recent RfA. Unfortunately, I have decided to withdraw from the RfA due to concerns brought up in the oppose votes. The final tally was 4 supports and 6 opposes. I would like to thank American Eagle for the nomination. Razorflame 22:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Off-wiki discussion

Would you email me when you get a chance?-- Chris†ianMan16 t c r 00:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Email

I've sent you another email. Cheers, Razorflame 01:42, 24 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

RfA Thankspam

  American Eagle/Archive 6, thanks for your comments in my recent RfA which closed as 12/11 or "no consensus". I hope to work on the things that were raised and prove to the community that I am worthy of the mop, this includes showing my RL stability, that I don't have Ownership issues with DYK and also showing that I know what consensus is. Special thanks go to Kennedy for nominating me! Thanks for your comments! GoblinBot3 (talk)  

GoblinBot3 (talk) 10:59, 27 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Thank you for participating in my recent request for adminship, which passed with a total of 21/5. I will try to the best of my abilities to maintain the trust of the community, and I will carefully consider the opposes to learn how to further improve. Cheers, Juliancolton (talk) 14:03, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

AE...

...time to change your opinion on my behaviour on my ER. TurboGolf 07:49, 1 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re: User/user talk

Thank you! I'm so happy that this Wikipedia isn't as stringent with template regulation and modification. I feel my ideas are more appreciated here since nobody's complaining... obentomusubi 04:42, 3 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

hey

I've had my rollback remove, see the bottom of my talkpage and WP:RFR.-- † CM16 t c r 23:43, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, but I do not know what you want me to do. I cannot wheel-war and undo Synergy's removal of the flag, so I am afraid you will have to show Synergy (or the community in general) that you can be entrusted with it. Sorry, there isn't anything I can do right now. TheAE talk 23:54, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I wasn't really asking anything, I was telling you.-- † CM16 t c r 00:07, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

My RfB

Dear AE, thank you for participating in my RfB, which ended with a tally of 21/5. I appreciate your support and will do my best in this new role. Thanks. Chenzw  Talk  07:46, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination

Hi there, American Eagle. I have decided to nominate you for bureaucrat here on the Simple English Wikipedia. Please give me a holler if you would like me to go through with this nomination. Cheers, Razorflame 14:41, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

If you would like to nominate me, I would accept. :) TheAE talk 00:31, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Ok then, I'll see what I can pull out of my hat :). Cheers, Razorflame 17:03, 6 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the welcome

Thanks for the welcome message and helpful links. WaterGlass (talk) 06:27, 7 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your RfB

Hello AE, I have just closed your RfB. The result was not promoted. Please don't be disheartened by this however, but instead work on the issues pointed out. Please also understand that this closure is not anything against you as a user or admin. Cheers, Chenzw  Talk  05:40, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

What?! That should have passed! :P Well, I thought about withdrawing it last Sunday, but decided to let it go through and see the comments I'd get. Thank you, Chenzw. TheAE talk 05:45, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry man, i was really pulling for u. Now, I hope someone else doesn't make anything biased out of this but could you goto to WP:RFR?-- † CM16 t c r 06:16, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:VIP

Hi, re: this. I was thinking the same thing, but added them due to the sheer number so that an admin would at least be alerted to them. I don't remove VIPs after I add them; admin job. Cheers :) fr33kman t - c 00:43, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, and that's fine. I'll be watching him, and will block on-sight if needed. Thanks for the alert! :) TheAE talk 00:49, 17 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:PW

That's not a bad redirect though.-- † CM16 t c r 20:44, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have recreated it as QD R2 says bad redirect and it's not.-- † CM16 t c r 20:47, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I have created a thread here on simple talk to discuss something you should take into account before re-deleting.-- † CM16 t c r 20:53, 21 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Woah

Yes I do remember. Getting older but not quite that old yet. :). CambridgeBayWeather (talk) 00:11, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Just a note to say thanks, American Eagle, for your comments and vote in my RFB which closed as successful with 25 supports and no opposes. It is my second unanimous request, which I find astounding. In my previous thanks (from where I stole the code for this one) I promised you I would do my best as an admin. I promise I will continue to do my best as an editor, admin and 'crat, and I won't let you down! Thanks again, Kennedy (talk) 20:57, 23 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Trombone

Sorry, I just saw a mass deletion with no edit summary fr33kman t - c 04:07, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

It's alright. :) TheAE talk 23:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity

SHEESH!!-- † CM16 t c r 22:24, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I know. I'm waiting to see what happens on WP:AN. TheAE talk 23:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I'm trying not to express it but the conversation is getting offensive, but I know it's for the sake of neutrality, which is why I'm not writing back.-- † CM16 t c r 03:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Saint Peter's Basilica

Hi. You voted weak oppose here and as I did what was asked, you could maybe reconsider. Thanks, Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 23:03, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to Support – Good job on all the red links! TheAE talk 23:06, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, wasn't to hard ;) Yotcmdr =talk to the commander= 23:08, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

it was a weird thing, the previous one was going to the actor Fred Astaire, thanks for fixing this..

Bubblycanuck (talk) 23:28, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on your talk page. TheAE talk 23:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

:O)

thats so helpful of you! people here are so nice and helpful!173.33.21.101 (talk) 23:46, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That is nice to say. :) TheAE talk 23:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Uranium

Hi - I actually thought the newer edit was better. It had some good explanations of what some of the terms meant. Could you perhaps put it back with a complex tag? I could look at it later.--Peterdownunder (talk) 23:39, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've undone myself. I suppose either way might be more simpler. TheAE talk 23:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Christianity move protection?

Hello, I have Christianity on my watchlist and I saw that it is currently move-protected only against anonymous editors. Do you believe that there would ever be a valid reason to move the article to something else? Thank you. LovesMacs (talk) 01:01, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for move-protecting the article. I asked because I have seen similar vandalism on English Wikipedia. While you are at it, could you please move-protect Islam, Judaism, and other high-profile articles? Thank you. LovesMacs (talk) 22:57, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]
 Done for the two other religions given. :) TheAE talk 00:52, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

welcome

Thank you for the welcome.

I see you used the {{welcome}} template. What do you think about the {{welcome2}} template? --DavidCary (talk) 06:18, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I decided to give you another [third] welcome! :) I really like the template. :) TheAE talk 06:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

--GoblinBot3 (talk) 22:03, 2 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://simple.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:American_Eagle/Archive_6&oldid=8879461"