Wikipedia:Requests for deletion

From Simple English Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
If you think a page should be deleted, read the deletion policy to make sure.
Then follow these instructions on how to request a page for deletion. To find more information on what discussed deletions and quick deletions are:
PLEASE READ THIS

Before nominating: checks and alternatives [change source]

Prior to nominating article(s) for deletion, please be sure to:

A. Read and understand these policies and guidelines
  1. The Wikipedia deletion policy, which explains valid grounds for deletion.
  2. The main four guidelines and policies that inform deletion discussions: notability (WP:N), verifiability (WP:V), reliable sources (WP:RS), and what Wikipedia is not (WP:NOT)
  3. Subject-specific notability guidelines, which can be found at Category:Wikipedia notability guidelines
B. Carry out these checks
  1. Confirm that the article does not meet the criteria for quick deletion.
  2. If there are verifiability, notability or other sourcing concerns, take reasonable steps to search for reliable sources. (See step D.)
  3. Review the article's history to check for potential vandalism or poor editing.
  4. Read the article's talk page for previous nominations and/or that your objections haven't already been dealt with.
  5. Check "What links here" in the article's sidebar, to see how the page is used and referenced within Wikipedia.
  6. Check if there are interlanguage links, also in the sidebar, which may lead to more developed and better sourced articles. Likewise, search for native-language sources if the subject has a name in a non-Latin alphabet (such as Japanese or Greek), which is often in the lede.
C. Consider whether the article could be improved rather than deleted
  1. If the article can be fixed through normal editing, then it is not a candidate for RfD.
  2. If the article was recently created, please consider allowing the contributors more time to develop the article.
  3. If an article has issues try first raising your concerns on the article's talk page, with the main contributors, and/or adding a cleanup tag, such as {{notability}}, {{hoax}}, {{original research}}, or {{advert}}; this ensures readers are aware of the problem and may act to fix it.
  4. If the topic is not important enough to merit an article on its own, consider merging or redirecting to an existing article. This should be done particularly if the topic name is a likely search term.
D. Search for additional sources, if the main concern is notability
  1. The minimum search expected is a normal Google search, a Google Books search, a Google News search, and a Google News archive search; Google Scholar is suggested for academic subjects.
  2. If you find a lack of sources, you've completed basic due diligence before nominating. However, if a quick search does find sources, this does not always mean an RfD on a sourcing basis is unwarranted. If you spend more time examining the sources, and determine that they are insufficient, e.g., because they only contain passing mention of the topic, then an RfD nomination may still be appropriate.
  3. If you find that adequate sources do appear to exist, the fact that they are not yet present in the article is not a proper basis for a nomination. Instead, you should consider citing the sources, or at minimum apply an appropriate template to the page that flags the sourcing concern. Common templates include {{unreferenced}}, {{refimprove}}, {{third-party}}, {{primary sources}} and {{one source}}.

Discussed deletion[change source]

Put the deletion tag on the article.
  1. Click "Change source" at the top of the page to be deleted.
  2. In the edit box, add this tag: {{rfd|REASON}}. Put it at the top of the page, above the rest of the text. Then, replace the text "REASON" with a short reason why the page should be deleted. Do not be too specific here. You can add more details on the discussion page (see below).
  • It is a good idea to write a change summary to let others know what you are doing. You can say "nominating for deletion", "requesting deletion", or something like that.
  1. Click "Save changes" at the bottom to save the page with the deletion tag at the top.
  • You can also check the "Watch this page" check box to add the page to your watchlist. This lets you know if the page for deletion has been changed. If the deletion tag is removed any time before the discussion is closed, it should be put back.
Create a discussion page.
  1. If the deletion tag has been added to the page, a box should appear at the top of the article with a link saying "Click here to create a discussion page!" Click that link.
  2. You should be taken to a page starting with "Creating Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/..." along with the current year and the name of the article to be deleted. In the edit box, the following tag should have already been added: {{RfD/Preload/Template}} . Replace the text PLACE REASON HERE with a more detailed reason why the page should be deleted.
  • It is helpful to include links to the various policy pages about Wikipedia (that begin with Wikipedia:). Here are some examples of this: "This article is [[Wikipedia:COMPLEX|not easy to understand]]" or "Not a [[Wikipedia:notable|notable]] topic''. This will make others more aware of why the page is not acceptable under Wikipedia's policies.
  1. Click "Save changes" to save the new discussion page when you are done.
  • A change summary you can write for this page is "creating discussion page", "starting deletion discussion", or something like that.
  • As with the page for deletion, you can check the "Watch the page" box. This will let you know if someone else has replied to your discussion.
List it here
  1. Copy the title of the discussion page to the clipboard. You can do this by dragging the mouse over the text from "Wikipedia" to the end of the page title to highlight it, then right-clicking and selecting "Copy".
  2. Go to the list of deletion requests, and click "change source" beside the words "Current deletion request discussions".
  3. At the top of the list of discussions, paste the title from the clipboard (right-click and select "Paste"). Add a pair of curly brackets before and after the title to make a template that will copy the content of the discussion page onto the main deletion page, like this:
{{Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/(name of page to be deleted)}}
  1. Finally, click "Save changes" to add the discussion to the list. If the page saves successfully, you should see your deletion discussion at the top of the list. And that's it!

Quick deletion[change source]

If you think a page has nonsense content, add {{non}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page does not say why the subject is important, add {{notable}} to the top of the page.

If you think a page should be deleted per other quick deletion rules, add {{QD|reason}} to the top of the page.

Notifying the user[change source]

Generally, you should try to be civil and tell the user that created the page to join the discussion talking about the page. This can be done by adding {{subst:RFDNote|page to be deleted}} ~~~~ to the bottom of their talkpage.

Discussions[change source]

  • The discussion is not a vote. Please make suggestions on what action to take, and support your suggestion with reasons.
  • Please look at the article before you make a suggestion. Do not make an opinion using only the information given by the nominator. Looking at the history of the article may help to understand the situation.
  • Please read other comments and suggestions. They may have helpful information.
  • Start your comments or suggestions on a new line. Start with * and sign after your comment by adding ~~~~ to the end. If you are responding to another editor, put your comment directly below theirs and make sure your comment is indented (using more than one *).
  • New users can make suggestions, but their ideas may not be considered, especially if the suggestion seems to be made in bad faith. The opinion of users who had an account before the start of the request may be given more weight or importance.
  • Suggestions by users using "sock puppets" (more than one account belonging to the same person) and IP addresses will not be counted.
  • Please make only one suggestion. If you change your mind, change your first idea instead of adding a new one. The best way to do this is to put <s> before your old idea and </s> after it. For example, if you wanted to delete an article but now think it should be kept, you could put: "Delete Quick keep".
  • If you would like an article to be kept, you can improve the article and try to fix the problems given in the request for deletion. If the reasons given in the nomination are fixed by changing, the nomination can be withdrawn by the nominator, and the deletion discussion will be closed by an administrator.
  • Try to avoid confusing suggestions, such as delete and merge.

Remember: You do not have to make a suggestion for every nomination. You should think about not making a suggestion if:

  1. A nomination involves a topic that you do not know much about.
  2. Everyone has made the same suggestion and you agree with that suggestion.
  • All times are in UTC.

Current deletion request discussions[change source]

Wikipedia:Requests for deletion/Requests/2020/Joseph Kargbo


Diamond axe studios music[change source]

Diamond axe studios music (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

つがる has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Google doesn't return much besides the Youtube channel itself, Youtube channel doesn't seem to be notable. つがる Let's Talk! :) 🍁 21:47, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 21:47, 1 December 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Lacey Duvalle[change source]

Lacey Duvalle (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Pathsw has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: not notable, deleted in enwiki en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lacey Duvalle and en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lacey Duvalle (2nd nomination) Pathsw (talk) 11:36, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 11:36, 30 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Anka Tsitsishvili[change source]

Anka Tsitsishvili (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Fashion designer from Georgia, in her early 30s. We get references, amongst others from Vogue (Russia) or Harper's Bazaar. Article was created by an IP editor, in one edit; external links go to IMDB and Instagram. I propose we delete this; what do other people think? Eptalon (talk) 16:17, 22 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete Insufficient notability. As the nominator says, only in her early 30's and the mentions of her in the references are brief and/or PR puff pieces. The movie she "starred" in was an 18-minute short with several other "actresses". This article was nominated for deletion on English Wikipedia earlier this year [1], but was quick-deleted instead because it was created by a sockpuppet of the globally locked account Çelebicihan. Çelebicihan is an undisclosed paid editor who created many promotional articles on English Wikipedia for non-notable Russians or non-notable people with careers in Russia. To date he has over 40 sockpuppets Voceditenore (talk) 10:20, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 16:17, 29 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Philosophy (view)[change source]

Philosophy (view) (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Chenzw has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This was originally QD'd as a duplicate, subsequently disputed at DRV. In lieu of the discussion there, I have restored this and am sending this to RFD for discussion. Chenzw  Talk  15:27, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Comment So I'll re-state the argument here: Look at Hedonism, and compare that with the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Or look at the Stanford Entry for Liberalism, and compare that to what we have (Liberalism). I currently don't see in what way the making a distinction between philosophy, and a certain school of thought (Liberalism, Hedonism) would help us. And yes, I know, our articles need a lot of work. --Eptalon (talk) 09:43, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  • What this aims at is the slack alternate use of "philosophy", namely the system a person forms for the conduct of life. I don't think we should go there, but if we do the corresponding page on En is Philosophy of life. I see this content as just an off-the-cuff spiel, and vote for deletion. I see there's also an En page on the Human condition. I don't think it achieves much. Macdonald-ross (talk) 10:15, 22 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I largely agree with Eptalon. It is very difficult to expand the article beyond a dictionary entry and I am already trying to improve other articles so that the use of the word "philosophy" becomes less of an issue. This is somewhat the same problem faced by en:School of thought. However, I mostly disagree with Macdonald-ross's assessment. As per my comments on the deletion review, some other solution should be decided upon before deciding to delete the page. I think it will mostly come down to how other articles are worded. Kindly, Oeqtte (talk) 04:18, 23 November 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:27, 28 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Sociological imagination[change source]

Sociological imagination (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Page has been moved to wikitionary already, just doing some clean up Derpdart56 (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

 Comment I will also check the others in the "Pages requested to be moved to Wikitionary" category, and if they have been done, I'll add them to this list. This is just for clean up, like i said. Derpdart56 (talk) 15:40, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

  •  Keep This is a not a single world dictionary entry. It is a well established concept in sociology. The very brief stub was not that good, but this is a principle worth inclusion in an encyclopedia. See the EnWP article. --Gotanda (talk) 23:29, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete Pure dicdef in current state. No prejudice in keeping if an encyclopaedia article is created. --IWI (talk) 23:46, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
     Keep changing to keep as it is now an encyclopedia article. --IWI (talk) 15:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
     Comment Right. It is now an article stub because I spent 2-3 minutes simplifying a few sentences from EnWP. Something anyone asking for deletion as clean up in this discussion could have done. The previous state of the article was not good, but if half the time on this deletion discussion had been spent on improvement we all would have saved time and had a better wikipedia. Far too fast and aggressive on deletion on some of these. --Gotanda (talk) 23:30, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete Obviously it is a dicdef, and a poor one at that. Macdonald-ross (talk) 09:07, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  • The article/stub in its current form is not well-suited to be moved to Wiktionary. Yes, what we have is not the best of definitions, but if I understand the EnWP article, we are not looking at a simple word definition. This seems to be a concept from Sociology, and with a little digging, I am certain at least two, if not three positions regarding this can be found. So: yes, it is probably encyclopedic, and it probably deserves an article here. The problem I see though: Writing that article in simple language is probably not an easy task, even for a stub. I am in favor of keeping this, provided we get a 2-3 sentence stub explaining the concept. --Eptalon (talk) 12:03, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep per Eptalon. --Saroj Uprety (talk) 12:30, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  • I know deletion is not clean up, but this is pure dicdef. Will be leaning delete unless someone expands, then defaults to Keep as this is clearly notable topic. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 19:09, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep per above. The sociological imagination is an important concept that is discussed at any sociology undergraduate course, and deletion is not clean up. Chenzw  Talk  15:23, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
But the scrap of a page says "The sociological imagination is seeing the relationship between individual experiences and society". Isn't that exactly what sociology does? It doesn't actually add anything. There's no real content. Macdonald-ross (talk) 06:53, 24 November 2020 (UTC)


This request is due to close on 15:36, 26 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Kunal M Shah[change source]

Kunal M Shah (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Contested quick deletion ("A4 - notability"); person seems to be a journalist, and a (movie?) director. Person active since 2012, collaborated making over 30 movies if I am to beliee the article. Two references ("Deccan chronicle", "Economic times") look half-way reliable. Where I am, Google mostly finds social media. So rather than quick-delete for A4-notability, I think we should discuss. Eptalon (talk) 15:28, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete Sources aren't reliable or at most cover them briefly, no indication meeting GNG. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:37, 20 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete --Alaa :)..! 14:01, 21 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete spam. --IWI (talk) 15:36, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 15:28, 26 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Blerta Veseli[change source]

Blerta Veseli (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: National contestant of Miss Universe 2020, for Kosovo. Doubtful notability, but runner up ot a beauty pageant (+modelling contracz). No image, lady is in her early 20s. Propose deletion. Eptalon (talk) 23:52, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 23:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Amanda Lindgren[change source]

Amanda Lindgren (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Politician at a youth party of a city of roughly 30k people. We received it as cross-wiki spam, I would prefer to delete it (but not as cross-wiki spam; rather on grounds of notabity). The lady was born in 2001, so is 18 or 19 years old. What do others think? Eptalon (talk) 23:48, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Delete - fails GNG, no significant coverage found regarding her activities in the Moderate Youth League, position on the Public Health Board is equivalent to that of an unelected local official. Chenzw  Talk  12:42, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete per Chenzw. Not notable enough for inclusion at this time. --IWI (talk) 15:54, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 23:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Laura Olascuaga[change source]

Laura Olascuaga (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Local model, who happens to be the Colombian entry to Miss Universe 2020.The lady is in her mid-20s, we don't have a picture. Looking at google, I get many sites (probably newspapers) reporting her becoming the Colombian entry. I don't know Miss Universe; since we don't even have a picture of her, and the article itslef is stub-like, I propose we delete this. Note: I am going throuh regular deletion; I don't know the context of the beauty contest. Eptalon (talk) 23:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 23:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Songs considered to be the worst[change source]

Songs considered to be the worst (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Listing of roughly 20 songs, "considered to be worst". We also get 85 references for these. If I look at the song listing, i find songs like Macarena, Who let the dogs out, Gagnam style or Despacito. While I don't necessarily like these, they have been a hit for at least one season. So I don't really see how they could be "worst". List is much effort to maintain, and being "worst" isp robably against NPOV. So I propose we delete this. I want to do it in a regular RfD so that the community has a chance to comment. Eptalon (talk) 09:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Delete matter of opinion and not really encyclopedic content. --IWI (talk) 09:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment I agree that the inclusion criteria is vague, however I cannot deny that there are reliable sources which specifically call out "worst" songs, and that there are songs which receive consistently negative critique. This article is about songs considered to be the worst, not songs that are the worst (which would be a violation of WP:OR, indeed). The encyclopedia makes no judgement specifically about whether a song is bad or not. Chenzw  Talk  12:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Taking the example of Axel F. (By Harold Faltermeyer). Was originally composed for Beverly Hillls Cop 90210 (in 1984 or 1985); That version stayed in the charts several (15+) weeks, reaching second place in Germany, Switzerland, Austria and the UK. But thats not the version we have. We do have (I think the ringtone) for mobile phones of 2001. Yes, probably all the songs are notable, and given the references, someone considered each of them "worst". Does that mean we need this list? --Eptalon (talk) 12:40, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  • I am not sure what point you are trying to make - the cover is the one that was criticised, and considered by multiple sources to be the "worst". Chenzw  Talk  10:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
If I have five songs that are notable (for whatever reason), a listing of these five songs isn't necessarily notable. --Eptalon (talk) 11:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
Even if those songs are widely considered by multiple reliable sources to be the worst? Chenzw  Talk  16:20, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete As I commented when I tagged this for QD, the songs may be notable, but this list is not. It's just completely subjective OR. --Gotanda (talk) 22:37, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete Not a proper article --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Comment Enwiki has a similar article. I think this is part of an encyclopedic content.--Saroj Uprety (talk) 02:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep per above, maybe the list can be expended to include all music, but per en:Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/List_of_music_considered_the_worst (all the arguments there - a recent 2019 RFD that is very well participated) and all the other RFD before it (5 since 2009 ended with keep, 1 with no consensus on the same topic), I don't see why we should defer from the en arguments. There is no policy reason to delete this page. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 11:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete Strange to say, there's no criterion for "worst", and this is just editors' opinion of what is worst. Matter of opinion, not encyclopedic. Macdonald-ross (talk) 14:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 09:05, 23 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


Recently closed deletion discussions[change source]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 22:23, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Meropia[change source]

Meropia (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Derpdart56 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This seems sus, google searches turn up myopia. not notable. Derpdart56 (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

 Delete. New company, no track record. Macdonald-ross (talk) 15:36, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

  • speedy delete more crosswiki hoax bullshit from MD Anan Islam. Praxidicae (talk) 17:27, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
While I agree, I don’t feel it to be absolutely necessary to refer to someone’s contributions as "bullshit". Surely we can discuss deletions in a more professional manner. --IWI (talk) 23:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Delete at the very least not notable. --IWI (talk) 23:59, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 14:57, 26 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Delete. --Eptalon (talk) 07:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)

Sam Bechara[change source]

Sam Bechara (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Thegooduser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable. Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:31, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

This request is due to close on 01:31, 24 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  DeleteChenzw  Talk  14:48, 23 November 2020 (UTC).

Sahnil Bhatnagar[change source]

Sahnil Bhatnagar (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Thegooduser has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Doesn't seem to be notable, some results from a Google lookup, Instagram is first result though Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Closing Admin, Please check the votes carefully --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 03:27, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

Respected Sir, Sahnil bhatnagar is an Indian TV Actor as well as he is a social media influencer. He is 7-8 good articles published on him which I have attached as well as you can look at his video links. He is an actor who has appeared in MTV India shows. If you just google him you'll find his work and links ( https://www.google.co.in/search?q=sahnil+bhatnagar&sxsrf=ALeKk02rpk9ET8-Sp0DvSNNlKHiEMXskzQ:1605577070947&source=lnms&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwiRrOTXuIjtAhX8wjgGHQ6YDQ0Q_AUIDigA&biw=1366&bih=657&dpr=1 ) I have been following him snce 5 good years. Please reconsider it. Thank you! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swarajmishra7 (talkcontribs) 01:40, 17 November 2020 (UTC)


  • A Google search, leads me to IMDB and Instagram, Which themselves, are not valid sources. --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:42, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Respected Sir, If you check the google news you'll find the articles of him. i'll show the article links for you to see. https://yahoomagazine.com/sahnil-bhatnagar-good-looks-matter-the-most-on-tv/ https://english.newstracklive.com/news/this-indobrazilian-likeecouple-sets-a-new-crossborder-couple-goals-for-millennials-sc71-nu-1055475-1.html https://www.timebulletin.com/the-best-of-actor-sahnil-bhatnagar-interview/

 https://popcake.tv/news/lyubov-bez-granicz-polzovateli-likee-sledyat-onlajn-za-romanom-indijsko-brazilskoj-pary  
 http://www.shcaoan.com/wy/znews/91847.html  

https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/nepal/english/bollyy-epaper-bolyy/this+indo+brazilian+likee+couple+sets+a+new+cross+border+couple+goals+for+millennials-newsid-n153801082 https://www.fabworldtoday.com/sahnil-bhatnagar-i-get-inspired-by-negative-roles-and-stories/ https://www.ustimesnow.com/sahnil-bhatnagar-good-looks-matter-the-most-on-tv/ https://www.openthenews.com/actor-sahnil-bhatnagar-an-individual-chooses-drugs-and-not-an-industry/ If you check his imdb pictures too you can see his work (virtual proof) - https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11949778/mediaviewer/rm425436161?context=default

I am doing this because I have always attended his live streams being a follower and he deserves to have his own wikipedia page. Its a request that you please consider it. I have even made changes in the article, corrected everything. Thank you for being a mentor and guiding me.

I really request you sir to consider this because he is an actor as well as a social media influencer. I would highly request you to check the article once again. I have kept the article neutral, followed proper grammar and have removed irrelevant sources. Rest I am sure I have your guidance. I am really thank full to you for helping me in this.

I cannot read some of the sources, because, they are in Russian/Chinese. I'm not sure if they are reliable or not, so I'll let the community decide. Also, From what you are saying, it seems you have an Conflict of Interest. Remember, just because the article is listed here, doesn't mean it will get deleted. --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 02:11, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  • I totally agree sir that they are in chinese and russian, its so because he has 1.4 million followers so his followers are from worldwide specially China,Russia,Brazil and India. I have nothing to do with him, I just found him deserving so I created. Rest its all upto the community. I have collected all the proofs and it would be great if the community will help me . I'll be obliged. Thank you for giving your time . — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swarajmishra7 (talkcontribs) 02:17, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep Page should be kept because on searching him on google we can find his articles as well as I translated and cross checked. its reliable! So from my side its a YES — Preceding unsigned comment added by Samuelmartini42 (talkcontribs) 02:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC) This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page.
  •  Keep Looking at the article and all the reference links this actor is completely notable and I saw his videos on youtube and instagram. This page should not get deleted because it competes all the criteria for a wikipedia page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhushanpatelgujarati (talkcontribs) 02:53, 17 November 2020 (UTC) This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page.
  •  Keep It clearly looks notable as his MTV appearance in the show can be seen as well he has quite good news articles published — Preceding unsigned comment added by Angelbrunette (talkcontribs) 03:14, 17 November 2020 (UTC) This user has made few or no contributions outside of this page.
  •  Delete above votes seem like coi and this just seems like advertising Derpdart56Derpdart56 (talk) 15:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Hello Sir, I have found all the articles about him, submitting all the links together now, Please go through it- https://yahoomagazine.com/sahnil-bhatnagar-good-looks-matter-the-most-on-tv/ https://english.newstracklive.com/news/this-indobrazilian-likeecouple-sets-a-new-crossborder-couple-goals-for-millennials-sc71-nu-1055475-1.html
https://www.timebulletin.com/the-best-of-actor-sahnil-bhatnagar-interview/
https://www.lifeandstylenews.com/this-indo-brazilian-likeecouple-sets-a-new-cross-border-couple-goals-for-millennials/
https://popcake.tv/news/lyubov-bez-granicz-polzovateli-likee-sledyat-onlajn-za-romanom-indijsko-brazilskoj-pary
http://www.shcaoan.com/wy/znews/91847.html
https://www.wikiwiki.in/actor/sahnil-bhatnagar/
https://m.dailyhunt.in/news/nepal/english/bollyy-epaper-bolyy/this+indo+brazilian+likee+couple+sets+a+new+cross+border+couple+goals+for+millennials-newsid-n153801082
https://www.fabworldtoday.com/sahnil-bhatnagar-i-get-inspired-by-negative-roles-and-stories/

https://www.ustimesnow.com/sahnil-bhatnagar-good-looks-matter-the-most-on-tv/

https://www.imdb.com/name/nm11949778/

Respected Sir Derpdart56Derpdart56 There is no COI , you can ask patrollers to cross check everything. I have always been genuine and not fraud in my entire life. Hope you understand! Take care ! Have a nice day — Preceding unsigned comment added by Swarajmishra7 (talkcontribs) 17:08, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:23, 24 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Chenzw  Talk  16:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Princess Adrienne, Duchess of Blekinge[change source]

Princess Adrienne, Duchess of Blekinge (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

2001:4452:493:9400:5C2:1FD1:2AD2:B930 has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: This article of a Swedish royalty does not meet Wikipedia standards. Even not likely a public figure. 2001:4452:493:9400:5C2:1FD1:2AD2:B930 (talk) 01:51, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  •  Keep Page is on several other Wikipedia Languages, and Results came from a Google lookup --Thegooduser Let's Talk! :) 🍁 01:53, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep She is in line for the Swedish throne, which seems notable to me. --Auntof6 (talk) 05:08, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep As per my research, She is notable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Monalisafernandes (talkcontribs) 04:23, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep exceeds the notability guidelines. --IWI (talk) 23:53, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:51, 23 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The outcome of this request for deletion was to  Keep. Chenzw  Talk  16:13, 21 November 2020 (UTC)

Victor Hernández Cruz[change source]

Victor Hernández Cruz (edit · talk · history · links · watch · logs · delete) · close request

Eptalon has nominated this page for deletion for the reason: Poet from Puerto Rico; there's an EnWp article here. According to that article, the poet seems ro have won some prizes (cross-check notability). When searching on Google, EnWp comes up as first hit. Also, given that the person is a presumably well-known poet, I would expect more Interwiki links than Persian and (probably) Arabic in the enwp article. I would expect languages such as Spanish or perhaps French (which are common in the Carribean). In my opinion, this poet has not yet reached the level of notability that we should include him in this Wikipedia. What do others think? Eptalon (talk) 01:14, 15 November 2020 (UTC)

Please discuss this request below, but keep in mind that you shouldn't vote on everything and that there may be options other than "keep" or "delete", such as merging.

Discussion[change source]

  • Keep - the poet was recognised in Life magazine in 1981, and has won the prestigious Griffin Poetry Prize, among other things. Meets criterion 4 of CREATIVE, if not more. The presence (or absence) of equivalent articles in other language editions of Wikipedia is irrelevant. Chenzw  Talk  02:33, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep - per Chenzw, Life covering it isn't easy as well as the multiple prizes. The enwp article actually serve to reinforce it's notable, given multiple authority control as well as more sources to show it meets GNG etc. Camouflaged Mirage (talk) 10:41, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Keep He's very notable. Observe [2], [3], [4] to name a few of the many sources available which attest to this. His work has been the subject of several scholarly articles, and there is even a study guide to his poem "Problems with Hurricanes" published by Cengage. Voceditenore (talk) 17:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)
    • Just adding here that the lack of an article on Cruz in the Spanish Wikipdia is not surprising. Although he was born in Puerto Rico, he moved with his family to New York as a child and was entirely educated in the US. His poetry is in English, not Spanish. There are also two articles in The New York Times: [5], [6]. The first, "Three American Poets" devotes considerable space to him. The second is a review of a 1973 anthology which includes his work and describes him as "the best known of the younger Puerto Rican poets". Voceditenore (talk) 08:05, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep many famous people have ENWP as their first hit. Many sources, is notable. --IWI (talk) 09:47, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  •  Keep as above comments. Also, searching Google News with languages set to Spanish gets me plenty of hits. Fewer sources in English is not an issue. --Gotanda (talk) 22:43, 16 November 2020 (UTC)

This request is due to close on 01:14, 22 November 2020 (UTC), seven days after it was filed, although it may be closed earlier at the discretion of an administrator.


The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not change it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page, such as the current discussion page. No more changes should be made to this discussion.


Related pages[change source]